Results: The estimated radiation dose was 0.41 6 0.05 mSv for the supine and 0.42 6 0.04 mSv for the prone acquisitions. In the endoluminal view, the image quality was rated better in HIR, whereas better scores were obtained in MBIR in the cross-sectional view, where the endoluminal noise was the lowest (p , 0.0001). Five (26%) polyps were not identified using both computeraided detection and endoluminal inspection in FBP images vs only one (5%) in MBIR and none in HIR images.Conclusion: This study showed that in submillisievert ultralow-dose CTC, the image quality for the endoluminal view is better when HIR is used, whereas MBIR yields superior images for the cross-sectional view. The inferior quality of images reconstructed with FBP may result in decreased detection of colonic lesions. Advances in knowledge: Radiation dose from CTC can be safely reduced ,1 mSv for both positions when iterative reconstruction is used. MBIR provides better image quality in the cross-sectional view and HIR in the endoluminal view.