2017
DOI: 10.1017/atsip.2017.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in deep learning approaches for image tagging

Abstract: Advances in deep learning approaches for image tagging jianlong fu and yong rui

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(125 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inevitably, some adjustments are required, such as different image categories (for social media content) or devising other image features from satellite data. Current advances in automated satellite processing (Fu & Rui, 2017) and social media content analysis (Gosal et al, 2019), together with increasing availability of satellite data with enhanced coverage (e.g., Guanter et al, 2015) and developments in powerful geospatial analysis platforms (e.g., Gorelick et al, 2017), will boost the assessment of nature's cultural contributions to people and the monitoring of conservation targets in wider areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inevitably, some adjustments are required, such as different image categories (for social media content) or devising other image features from satellite data. Current advances in automated satellite processing (Fu & Rui, 2017) and social media content analysis (Gosal et al, 2019), together with increasing availability of satellite data with enhanced coverage (e.g., Guanter et al, 2015) and developments in powerful geospatial analysis platforms (e.g., Gorelick et al, 2017), will boost the assessment of nature's cultural contributions to people and the monitoring of conservation targets in wider areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is not clear from Microsoft's documentation is how big their training set is, or how the training images were first annotated. Microsoft Research provides links to papers and videos its researchers have produced; Fu and Rui [44] survey the various approaches to automated image tagging. At the time of their writing, they point to a combination of noisy datasets used for training (such as Flickr photos tagged by humans) and contextual clues (using word-embeddings; see [45] for an introduction to these) to learn the probabilities that tags 'go together' in meaningful ways (or to put it another way, some tags preclude the likelihood of others).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the final model size is 2.60MB which is very lightweight to execute in any mobile platform. Where some well-known models like VGG, Reset has size more than 200MB [25]. After 100 epochs, 81.35% and 51.59% training accuracy have been achieved for gender and age respectively.…”
Section: A Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%