Plant Breeding Reviews 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119521358.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in DNA Markers and Breeding for Warm‐ and Cool‐Season Turfgrasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turfgrasses are broadly classified into two major categories: warm‐ and cool‐season grasses. Warm‐season grasses utilize the four‐carbon enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in photosynthesis and grow best at temperatures between 27 and 35°C, whereas cool‐season grasses utilize the three‐carbon enzyme Rubisco in photosynthesis and grow best at 15–24°C (Harris‐Shultz & Jespersen, 2018). Turfgrasses are primarily used for the development of low‐cost surfaces for outdoor sports fields, golf courses, and lawns; soil erosion control; dust stabilization; improving the quality of groundwater; soil improvement; carbon sequestration; and to enhance the beauty of surrounding areas (Beard & Green, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turfgrasses are broadly classified into two major categories: warm‐ and cool‐season grasses. Warm‐season grasses utilize the four‐carbon enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in photosynthesis and grow best at temperatures between 27 and 35°C, whereas cool‐season grasses utilize the three‐carbon enzyme Rubisco in photosynthesis and grow best at 15–24°C (Harris‐Shultz & Jespersen, 2018). Turfgrasses are primarily used for the development of low‐cost surfaces for outdoor sports fields, golf courses, and lawns; soil erosion control; dust stabilization; improving the quality of groundwater; soil improvement; carbon sequestration; and to enhance the beauty of surrounding areas (Beard & Green, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some cultivars are natural and induced mutations of existing ones, which makes their identification difficult (Caetano‐Anollés, 1998; Caetano‐Anollés et al., 1997; Harris‐Shultz et al., 2011). Different types of genetic markers have been implemented in evaluating genetic diversity of Cynodon , with DNA‐based markers being the most widespread (Harris‐Shultz & Jespersen, 2018). Genetic diversity of C. dactylon in China was extensively investigated using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF), simple sequence repeats (SSR), inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR), and sequence‐related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers (Huang, Liu, Bai, & Wang, 2014; Li, Liu, Lou, Hu, & Fu, 2011; Ling et al., 2012, 2015; Wang, Liao, Yuan, Guo, & Liu, 2011; Wang et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2006; Xie et al., 2015; Zheng, Xu, Liu, Zhao, & Liu, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with major crops, genomic and marker information amount for turf species is relatively low. Initially, various types of markers, including protein‐based isozyme markers were used, but currently DNA‐based markers are widely used in turf species (Baird et al., 2012; Harris‐Shultz & Jespersen, 2018). Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) have been used as early DNA‐based molecular markers in the warm‐season grasses—seashore paspalum ( Paspalum vaginatum Swartz), bermudagrass [ Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engelm]. (Guo, Wu, Anderson, Moss, & Zhu, 2015; Harris‐Shultz & Jespersen, 2018; Mulkey, Zuleta, Keebler, Schaff, & Milla‐Lewis, 2014; Tan et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2010). Single nucleotide polymorphisms were used to create high‐density genetic maps of St. Augustine grass (Yu, Kimball, & Milla‐Lewis, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%