Abstract:Coronaviruses pose a serious threat to public health. Tremendous efforts are dedicated to advance reliable and effective detection of coronaviruses. Currently, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis mainly relies on the detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genetic materials by using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. However, simpler and more rapid and reliable alternatives are needed to meet high demand during the pandemic. Biose… Show more
“…Voltametric aptasensors are among the most sensitive biosensors, allowing the detection of the femtomolar. Similar sensitivity was reached with the impedimetric biosensor based on the specific ACE2 receptor [63] .…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…More accurate interactions are required for a more sensitive and selective detection [62] . Torres and coworkers [63] proposed “RAPID”, an impedimetric biosensor able to detect SARS-CoV-2 S-protein within 4 minutes, by transforming the biochemical information from the specific molecular binding event between SARS-CoV-2 S-protein and angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) into an electrical signal. The binding between these two molecules causes a change in interfacial electron transfer kinetics of the redox probe and the electrode surface, detectable by measuring the Rct value.…”
Section: Electrochemical Biosensors For Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…List of abbreviations: Cu 2 O NCs= Cu 2 O nanocubes; Prot A=protein A; WO 3 = tungsten oxide; TFGE=thin film gold electrode; GA=glutaraldehyde; ACE2= angiotensin-converting enzyme-2; ABB= affinity-based biosensor; PFDT=1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecanethiol; PCB-AuE=printed circuit board gold electrode; VTM=viral transport medium. Sensor Technique Biomarker Biosensor Platform Nano-sensor Biosensor format Sample Linear range LOD References immunosensor EIS S-protein EDC-NHS/rGO/GC/S-protein Ab yes label free PBS 0.16-1.25 μg/mL2.5- 40 μg/mL 150 ng/mL [55] immunosensor EIS S-protein BSA/S-protein Ab/ProtA/Cu 2 O NCs/SPCE yes label free PBS 0.25 fg/ml -1 μg/mL 0.04 fg/mL [56] aptasensor EIS S-protein TFGE/SARS-CoV-2 Optimer no label free PBS - - [57] VIP-sensor EIS SARS-CoV-2 virus CNTs/WO 3 /SPCE yes label free PBS - 57 pg/mL3.7 copy/mL [61] ABB EIS S-protein ACE2/GA/SPE/ACE2 no label free PBSsaliva 10 fg/mL-100 ng/mL100 fg/mL-100 ng/mL 2.18 fg/mL1.39 pg/mL [63] ABB EIS S-protein EDC/NHS/AuSPE/ACE2 no label free PBS 700-1500 ng/mL1500-7000 ng/mL 299.3 ng/mL [64] ...…”
Section: Electrochemical Biosensors For Covid-19mentioning
“…Voltametric aptasensors are among the most sensitive biosensors, allowing the detection of the femtomolar. Similar sensitivity was reached with the impedimetric biosensor based on the specific ACE2 receptor [63] .…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…More accurate interactions are required for a more sensitive and selective detection [62] . Torres and coworkers [63] proposed “RAPID”, an impedimetric biosensor able to detect SARS-CoV-2 S-protein within 4 minutes, by transforming the biochemical information from the specific molecular binding event between SARS-CoV-2 S-protein and angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) into an electrical signal. The binding between these two molecules causes a change in interfacial electron transfer kinetics of the redox probe and the electrode surface, detectable by measuring the Rct value.…”
Section: Electrochemical Biosensors For Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…List of abbreviations: Cu 2 O NCs= Cu 2 O nanocubes; Prot A=protein A; WO 3 = tungsten oxide; TFGE=thin film gold electrode; GA=glutaraldehyde; ACE2= angiotensin-converting enzyme-2; ABB= affinity-based biosensor; PFDT=1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecanethiol; PCB-AuE=printed circuit board gold electrode; VTM=viral transport medium. Sensor Technique Biomarker Biosensor Platform Nano-sensor Biosensor format Sample Linear range LOD References immunosensor EIS S-protein EDC-NHS/rGO/GC/S-protein Ab yes label free PBS 0.16-1.25 μg/mL2.5- 40 μg/mL 150 ng/mL [55] immunosensor EIS S-protein BSA/S-protein Ab/ProtA/Cu 2 O NCs/SPCE yes label free PBS 0.25 fg/ml -1 μg/mL 0.04 fg/mL [56] aptasensor EIS S-protein TFGE/SARS-CoV-2 Optimer no label free PBS - - [57] VIP-sensor EIS SARS-CoV-2 virus CNTs/WO 3 /SPCE yes label free PBS - 57 pg/mL3.7 copy/mL [61] ABB EIS S-protein ACE2/GA/SPE/ACE2 no label free PBSsaliva 10 fg/mL-100 ng/mL100 fg/mL-100 ng/mL 2.18 fg/mL1.39 pg/mL [63] ABB EIS S-protein EDC/NHS/AuSPE/ACE2 no label free PBS 700-1500 ng/mL1500-7000 ng/mL 299.3 ng/mL [64] ...…”
Section: Electrochemical Biosensors For Covid-19mentioning
“…These antibodies are specific to a single epitope of a target molecule, but a slight change in conformation may lead to a dramatically reduced binding capacity [ 121 , 122 ]. However, an alternative approach known as antibody phage display can be employed, where the monoclonal antibodies can be engineered to improve binding affinity with specific viral markers [ 123 , 124 ]. The conventional method of producing monoclonal antibodies requires expensive experimentation with animals and labour-intensive procedures.…”
Section: Strategies To Enhance the Biosensor Performancementioning
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global health crisis caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard test for diagnosing COVID-19. Although it is highly accurate, this lab test requires highly-trained personnel and the turn-around time is long. Rapid and inexpensive immuno-diagnostic tests (antigen or antibody test) are available, but these point of care (POC) tests are not as accurate as the RT-PCR test. Biosensors are promising alternatives to these rapid POC tests. Here we review three types of recently developed biosensors for SARS-CoV-2 detection: surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based, electrochemical and field-effect transistor (FET)-based biosensors. We explain the sensing principles and discuss the advantages and limitations of these sensors. The accuracies of these sensors need to be improved before they could be translated into POC devices for commercial use. We suggest potential biorecognition elements with highly selective target-analyte binding that could be explored to increase the true negative detection rate. To increase the true positive detection rate, we suggest two-dimensional materials and nanomaterials that could be used to modify the sensor surface to increase the sensitivity of the sensor.
“…The development is founded on the implementation of new technologies and materials providing better specifi cations of the assays. New nanomaterials (89)(90)(91), molecules with an improved recognition capability -biorecognition elements like new type of antibodies or aptamers (92)(93)(94) and devices suitable for the point-of-care bioassays combining the biorecognition elements with a sensor platform, biosensors, and similar point-of-care diagnostic means (95)(96)(97)(98)(99)(100)(101)(102) are progressively evolving in the COVID-19 diagnostics.…”
Section: The Next Development In Sars-cov-2 Antigen Assaysmentioning
AIMS: This review is focused on the laboratory diagnoses of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by recognizing the antigen of the causative agent SARS-CoV-2 virus. Various antigen tests are available in this moment and these tests are being further developed in order to reach a better diagnostic value. The issue is reviewed in a complex view. METHODS: In this work, a complex survey of the current literature was made. The relevant and recent papers related to antigen tests of COVID-19 are discussed and cited. Basic specifi cations of the antigen tests and competitive methods were also scrutinized in the current literature. RESULTS: The survey of the current literature (years 2019 -2021) was made and diagnostic methods like lateral fl ow tests (lateral fl ow immunochromatographic assay) and various types of biosensors were specifi ed as tools for COVID-19 diagnosis and their application to be used as a point-of-care test is considered. CONCLUSIONS: Small hand-held assays applicable in the point-of-care conditions for diagnosis of COVID-19 by analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antigen are the means of a growing interest and these means undergo a signifi cant development leading to the improvements of their specifi cations and applicability to the current praxis. Merit of the assays is discussed in this paper (Tab. 3, Fig. 2, Ref. 109).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.