2014
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201301326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in enantiomeric resolution on monolithic chiral stationary phases in liquid chromatography and electrochromatography

Abstract: During the last decade, chiral monolithic stationary phases have been prepared and used for rapid enantioseparations in CEC and HPLC. Various chiral selectors are used to prepare these CSPs. The preparation, properties, and applications of these CSPs are discussed in this paper. Attempts have been made to describe optimization strategies and the chiral recognition mechanisms. A comparison of chiral separations in CEC and HPLC is described. Efforts have also been made to predict the future perspectives and chal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
(247 reference statements)
0
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is attractive to report that the reported profens have a benzene ring facilitating π–π interactions among the antipodes and chiral amylose derivatives. It is already established that π–π interactions are crucial in the chiral separation of many aromatic racemates . The setting of all the antipodes of profens in the derivatized amylose grooves is depicted in Figures .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is attractive to report that the reported profens have a benzene ring facilitating π–π interactions among the antipodes and chiral amylose derivatives. It is already established that π–π interactions are crucial in the chiral separation of many aromatic racemates . The setting of all the antipodes of profens in the derivatized amylose grooves is depicted in Figures .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amylose‐based CSPs, in general, demonstrated better enantioseparation capacity than the cellulose‐based one. Probably, it was due to higher helical nature of amylose in comparison to cellulose . A useful observation was made that the modification of the mobile phase by a “nonstandard” solvent, such as chloroform or 2‐ethoxyethanol, may improve enantioseparation to a degree.…”
Section: Chiral Resolution By Hplcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessed 30 25 different stationary phases to resolve a training set of 80 chiral molecules, using SFC (super critical flu0id chromatography). The columns were divided into 8 different classes, based on column chemistries, summarised in Table 2.…”
Section: Chiral Stationary Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%