2010
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.109.570523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Genomic Analysis of Stroke

Abstract: Abstract-As a result of technological advances, the genomic analysis of stroke has shifted from candidate gene association studies to genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Agnostic GWAS evaluate up to 90% of common genetic variation in a single experiment, creating an improved framework for identifying novel genetic leads for biochemical and cellular mechanisms underlying stroke. Given the ubiquity of the GWAS approach, it has become essential for stroke researchers and clinicians to be able to interpret GWA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, as ischemic stroke may be caused by occlusion (~80% of the cases) or hemorrhage (~20% of the cases) of cerebral blood vessels, several gene polymorphisms with a potential functional effect on blood coagulation proteins have been investigated in the last decade as potential risk factors for IS or CHD, with inconclusive results [28][29][30]. Similarly, a large number of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) investigating thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the human genome have failed to identify DNA sequence variants which, even when combined, are in a position to provide clinically useful and robust genotype-phenotype associations [26][27][28][29]. On the one hand, the results of these studies confirm the complex and multifactorial basis of cerebro-and cardiovascular disease in general, and more specifically of IS and CHD, while at the same time they exhibit considerable phenotypic variations in patient selection and study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, as ischemic stroke may be caused by occlusion (~80% of the cases) or hemorrhage (~20% of the cases) of cerebral blood vessels, several gene polymorphisms with a potential functional effect on blood coagulation proteins have been investigated in the last decade as potential risk factors for IS or CHD, with inconclusive results [28][29][30]. Similarly, a large number of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) investigating thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the human genome have failed to identify DNA sequence variants which, even when combined, are in a position to provide clinically useful and robust genotype-phenotype associations [26][27][28][29]. On the one hand, the results of these studies confirm the complex and multifactorial basis of cerebro-and cardiovascular disease in general, and more specifically of IS and CHD, while at the same time they exhibit considerable phenotypic variations in patient selection and study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…glutamate, GABA [16,17] Etiologic diagnosis of ischemic stroke, e.g., atherosclerotic (inflammatory markers) vs. [53]. However, genomewide association studies failed to reproduce the positive results obtained from previous stud ies [54] or the clinical usefulness was very low [55]. For exam ple, the hazard ratio and population attributable risk of hy pertension to ischemic stroke is 2.0 and 26%, respectively.…”
Section: Genetic Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers are now able to conduct accurate and efficient analyses across the entire genome of a study subject. Specifically, the genome-wide association study (GWAS) represents an experimental framework that can rapidly and efficiently identify novel pathogenic mechanisms, and can confirm a role for previously known mechanisms [34].…”
Section: Col4a1mentioning
confidence: 99%