2014
DOI: 10.1002/rob.21551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in In Situ Alignment Calibration of Doppler and High/Low‐end Attitude Sensors for Underwater Vehicle Navigation: Theory and Experimental Evaluation

Abstract: This paper reports the development and comparative performance evaluation, using laboratory and at‐sea field data, of new methods for the problem of in situ calibration of the alignment rotation matrix between Doppler sonar velocity sensors and attitude sensors arising in the navigation of underwater vehicles. Most previously reported solutions to this alignment calibration problem require the use of absolute navigation fixes of the underwater vehicle, thus requiring additional navigation sensors and/or beacon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The speed measurement error of the Doppler radar is mainly caused by the scale factor error and installation errors [33,34,35,36]. Here, the above errors must be mathematically modeled.…”
Section: Error Model Of Gyro/doppler Radar Dead Reckoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The speed measurement error of the Doppler radar is mainly caused by the scale factor error and installation errors [33,34,35,36]. Here, the above errors must be mathematically modeled.…”
Section: Error Model Of Gyro/doppler Radar Dead Reckoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound speed, installation error and ocean currents are the main DVL error factors, and most of the DVL errors caused by these factors can be calculated and compensated before DVL velocity output. However, not all DVL velocity errors can be compensated, which means that there is a residual error as the component of DVL velocity output and influence the DVL accuracy [ 36 , 37 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. It means that the components of DVL output includes the vehicle’s real velocity and the DVL residue error, and the DVL residue error is unclear where it comes from.…”
Section: Principle Of the Integration Subsystem And Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the integration accuracy based on DVL/INS can be influenced by some resources, for example, the rotation matrix between DVL and INS, the DVL measurement error and so forth. Troni [ 37 ] proposed the development of new methods for the problem of in situ calibration of the alignment rotation matrix between Doppler sonar velocity sensors and attitude sensors arising in the navigation of underwater vehicles and performed a comparative performance evaluation, using laboratory and at-sea field data. References [ 38 , 39 ] show the methods of calibrating the DVL measurement error, which is caused by the DVL itself, ocean currents and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a standalone system with high precision in short period and high data rate, INS can provide accurate position, velocity, and attitude by the measurements of accelerometers and gyroscopes, however, the bias errors of INS solution can grow unbounded with time elapsing [1]- [3]. The DVL is a common navigation instrument for a vessel, which can provide velocity by the principle of Doppler effects [4]. INS/DVL integrated navigation system can be employed to mitigate the error growth of the INS, which is deemed as one of the most potential method for precision long-range navigation for unmanned surface vessels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%