DOI: 10.33915/etd.5216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in MEMS IMU Cluster Technology for Small Satellite Applications

Abstract: In recent years, there has been increased interest in Micro-Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) due to their relatively small volumetric footprint and low-cost. Although this advantage far outweighs the volumetric footprint and cost of traditional high-performance IMUs, MEMS technology has yet to match the performance of such devices. In spite of this, it has been shown in theory that a cluster of MEMS IMUs may significantly improve the performance over a single MEMS IMU. To fur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the limitation of the CubeSats in terms of their size, power, and capacity to install extra sensors, the antenna attitude information may not be well measured, estimated, documented, and transferred back to the GPC with sufficient details. For example, due to power management needs, the IMU under its own high-accuracy experiment [25] onboard the CubeSat Simulation To Flight-1 (STF-1), investigated by NASA's Katherine Johnson Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) Facility and West Virginia University [21,26], was unable to be activated during the GNSS data collection. Depending on the latency requirements of the CubeSat orbits, the high-accuracy GNSS satellite orbits and clocks might not be available for the processing, e.g., the international GNSS service (IGS) final products [27,28], which has a latency of 12-18 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the limitation of the CubeSats in terms of their size, power, and capacity to install extra sensors, the antenna attitude information may not be well measured, estimated, documented, and transferred back to the GPC with sufficient details. For example, due to power management needs, the IMU under its own high-accuracy experiment [25] onboard the CubeSat Simulation To Flight-1 (STF-1), investigated by NASA's Katherine Johnson Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) Facility and West Virginia University [21,26], was unable to be activated during the GNSS data collection. Depending on the latency requirements of the CubeSat orbits, the high-accuracy GNSS satellite orbits and clocks might not be available for the processing, e.g., the international GNSS service (IGS) final products [27,28], which has a latency of 12-18 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%