2017
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10052-0129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Methods of Atraumatic Tooth Removal: An Update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparatus comprises a benex extractor, diamond drill (1.6, 1.8 mm), self-tapping screws, a pullstring, and a sectional impression tray (muska et al, 2013). The disadvantages of this technique are that it cannot be used in the cases where there is inappropriate root morphology and in grossly carious teeth where retention of screw is not possible (Jain et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The apparatus comprises a benex extractor, diamond drill (1.6, 1.8 mm), self-tapping screws, a pullstring, and a sectional impression tray (muska et al, 2013). The disadvantages of this technique are that it cannot be used in the cases where there is inappropriate root morphology and in grossly carious teeth where retention of screw is not possible (Jain et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However tooth extraction is a traumatic procedure that results in immediate destruction and loss of surrounding alveolar bone and soft tissue (Caplanis, lozada and Kan, 2005;patel et al, 2016). The sequence of extraction by conventional methods involves stripping of the periodontium around the tooth followed by luxation with an elevator or forceps (feck, 2010;Jain et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations