2022
DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20225001005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in molecular and optical detection strategies for grape downy mildew

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, this study illuminates latent P. viticola infection dynamics in commercial vineyards and its impact on GDM progression. In comparison to other methodologies such as PCR (Rouxel et al, 2014), spore trapping (Heger et al, 2022) and early warning prediction (Caffi & Rossi, 2010), which require testing after initial disease onset, this approach offers accessible and early assessment of potential P. viticola infection levels. This would aid growers in making informed decisions and implementing early intervention strategies for GDM management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, this study illuminates latent P. viticola infection dynamics in commercial vineyards and its impact on GDM progression. In comparison to other methodologies such as PCR (Rouxel et al, 2014), spore trapping (Heger et al, 2022) and early warning prediction (Caffi & Rossi, 2010), which require testing after initial disease onset, this approach offers accessible and early assessment of potential P. viticola infection levels. This would aid growers in making informed decisions and implementing early intervention strategies for GDM management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assay facilitates the detection of potential pathogens within mixed populations and allows quantification of very low infection levels (Ammour et al., 2020; Chu et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2023). The qPCR assay outperforms traditional PCR assays in detecting and quantifying DNA from various sources, including soilborne fungi (Luo et al., 2009), airborne spores (Heger et al., 2022), oomycetes (Sanzani et al., 2014) and plant tissues (Ammour et al., 2020). Furthermore, the quantitative and rapid detection capabilities of the qPCR make it invaluable for epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%