2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01633-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in nanopore direct RNA sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
88
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These developments enable us to confidently identify four previously unreported mRNA modifications in S. cerevisiae (m 1 G, m 2 G, m 2 2 G and m 5 U), demonstrating the utility of applying LC-MS/MS to discover and quantify mRNA modifications. Going forward, integrating quantitative LC-MS/MS approaches, like the one presented here, with sequencing based methodologies for transcriptome-wide modification mapping can facilitate the development of rigorous platforms to studying mRNA modifications 69,[109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118] . In addition to revealing the enzymes that incorporate these modifications, we also demonstrate that the presence of m 1 G, m 2 G, and m 5 U in mRNA can alter translation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These developments enable us to confidently identify four previously unreported mRNA modifications in S. cerevisiae (m 1 G, m 2 G, m 2 2 G and m 5 U), demonstrating the utility of applying LC-MS/MS to discover and quantify mRNA modifications. Going forward, integrating quantitative LC-MS/MS approaches, like the one presented here, with sequencing based methodologies for transcriptome-wide modification mapping can facilitate the development of rigorous platforms to studying mRNA modifications 69,[109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118] . In addition to revealing the enzymes that incorporate these modifications, we also demonstrate that the presence of m 1 G, m 2 G, and m 5 U in mRNA can alter translation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since DRS starts from the 3’-end of poly(A)-tailed RNAs, this results in a 3’-end bias. Furthermore, DRS also suffers from a 5’-end ambiguity because the sequenced RNA strands are released from the nanopore about 10–12nt before they reach the 5’-terminus (Jain et al, 2022). Artificial 5’- and 3’-termini are randomly distributed and generally represented by only single reads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, the data demonstrate that DRS can provide a more comprehensive and bias-free understanding of the T. brucei transcriptome. Provided that the current basecall accuracy and genome coverage limitations can be overcome (Jain et al, 2022), it should be possible to gain further insight into the plasticity of RNA processing reactions in T. brucei , which should accelerate our understanding of the RNA biology of the parasite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since DRS starts from the 3′-end of poly(A)-tailed RNAs, this results in a 3′-end bias. Furthermore, DRS also suffers from a 5′-end ambiguity, because the sequenced RNA strands are released from the nanopore about 10–12 nt before they reach the 5′-terminus [ 40 ]. Artificial 5′- and 3′-termini are randomly distributed and generally represented by only single reads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, the data demonstrate that DRS can provide a more comprehensive and bias-free understanding of the T. brucei transcriptome. Provided that the current basecall accuracy and genome-coverage limitations can be overcome [ 40 ], it should be possible to gain further insight into the plasticity of RNA processing reactions in T. brucei , which should accelerate our understanding of the RNA biology of the parasite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%