2007
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2007.891552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Particle Swarm Optimization for Antenna Designs: Real-Number, Binary, Single-Objective and Multiobjective Implementations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
398
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 706 publications
(403 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
398
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the time-modulated linear array design instances we also compare the performance of MOEA/D-DE with that of two single-objective optimization techniques, namely DEGL (DE with Global and Local Neighborhood) [39] and CLPSO (Comprehensive Learning PSO) [40] that are the state-of-the-art variants of DE and PSO, two metaheuristic algorithms widely used in past for various electromagnetic optimization [2,4,26,[41][42][43][44]. For singleobjective optimization techniques, we use a weighted linear sum of the objective functions given in (5a)-(5c).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the time-modulated linear array design instances we also compare the performance of MOEA/D-DE with that of two single-objective optimization techniques, namely DEGL (DE with Global and Local Neighborhood) [39] and CLPSO (Comprehensive Learning PSO) [40] that are the state-of-the-art variants of DE and PSO, two metaheuristic algorithms widely used in past for various electromagnetic optimization [2,4,26,[41][42][43][44]. For singleobjective optimization techniques, we use a weighted linear sum of the objective functions given in (5a)-(5c).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This comparison reflects the superiority of the time-modulation method over the two others. Secondly the results of MOEA/D-DE over time-modulated array design are compared with the state-of-theart variants of two popular single objective optimization algorithms of current interest, namely Differential Evolution (DE) [24] and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [25,26]. The comparison indicates that on the tested design instances MOEA/D-DE yields much better solutions as compared to the single-objective algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle swarm optimization [10][11][12][13] emulates the swarm behavior of insects, animals herding, birds flocking, and fish schooling where these swarms search for food in a collaborative manner. Each member in the swarm adapts its search patterns by learning from its own experience and other member's experiences.…”
Section: Modified Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSO [10] is an evolutionary algorithm and has been successfully used in the design of antenna arrays [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, phase-only, amplitude-only and complex synthesis of linear arrays is accomplished by GA and PSO in [16]. In [17], several PSO algorithms have been applied to the design of nonuniform and thinned arrays. Several modified PSO algorithms can also be found applied to the pattern synthesis of circular arrays or phased arrays [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%