2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in rigid porous high temperature filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar research efforts on reducing the CO 2 emissions from thermal processes were also presented for different fields, with a specific target of CO 2 modeling, such as in a large-scale coal-fired thermal power plant [24], in integrated processing of liquified natural gas [25], in a multigeneration cascade system [26], in the pyrolysis reaction of lignocellulosic waste [27], or through the integration of rigid porous high-temperature filters in thermal processes [28], among others.…”
Section: Moldenauer Et Al [23]mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Similar research efforts on reducing the CO 2 emissions from thermal processes were also presented for different fields, with a specific target of CO 2 modeling, such as in a large-scale coal-fired thermal power plant [24], in integrated processing of liquified natural gas [25], in a multigeneration cascade system [26], in the pyrolysis reaction of lignocellulosic waste [27], or through the integration of rigid porous high-temperature filters in thermal processes [28], among others.…”
Section: Moldenauer Et Al [23]mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It should moreover be reminded that extra reactant and thermal operation costs should be added, but a good product and heat management should reduce these to a minimum. The loss of reactant from the fluidized bed was minimum due to the use of metal-fiber filters at the exit of the reactor [30]. CO 2 should be separated and used in the reverse reaction.…”
Section: Cycling Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the original FCC unit lost on average approximately 5 tons catalyst per day at a cost of £1000 per ton, 7 days per week, 52 weeks per year, new de-dusting equipment [18] has reduced this considerably. These losses routinely arise largely form attrition of the catalyst [19].…”
Section: Figure 2 Simplified Fcc Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%