2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03112-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in targeted degradation of endogenous proteins

Abstract: Protein silencing is often employed as a means to aid investigations in protein function and is increasingly desired as a therapeutic approach. Several types of protein silencing methodologies have been developed, including targeting the encoding genes, transcripts, the process of translation or the protein directly. Despite these advances, most silencing systems suffer from limitations. Silencing protein expression through genetic ablation, for example by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, is irreversible, time cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
(252 reference statements)
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasingly, targeted protein degradation is being used as an investigative tool in cell biology, with hopes to translate into a therapeutic option for a variety of diseases (28). The efficacy of inducible protein degradation is influenced by a number of factors including protein synthesis rate, binding affinity of protein of interest to E3 ligase complexes, efficiency of ubiquitylation and presence of deubiquitinases (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, targeted protein degradation is being used as an investigative tool in cell biology, with hopes to translate into a therapeutic option for a variety of diseases (28). The efficacy of inducible protein degradation is influenced by a number of factors including protein synthesis rate, binding affinity of protein of interest to E3 ligase complexes, efficiency of ubiquitylation and presence of deubiquitinases (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeting at the protein level offers the advantages of targeting protein conformations, post-translational modifications, splice variants, different functional epitopes, targeting individual cellular compartments and interference independently of protein half-life (see details in Table 1). In contrast to knocking out a gene, interference at the protein level furthermore allows tuning the amounts of a target protein instead of allowing only the presence or complete absence of the protein [5,6]. The rapid effects achievable by protein delivery can be used to interfere in a stage-specific way and when time is a relevant factor.…”
Section: Why Target Proteins Directly?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid effects achievable by protein delivery can be used to interfere in a stage-specific way and when time is a relevant factor. This is also relevant if the time required to obtain a single clone with a gene knockout is long enough to allow genetic compensation for the modification introduced [6,7]. Delivering proteins directly circumvents stable DNA integration into the genome.…”
Section: Why Target Proteins Directly?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9-genome editing technology (Dickinson and 273 Goldstein 2016;Dokshin et al 2018), the auxin-inducible degron (AID) with or without a 274 fluorescent reporter (e.g., GFP or its derivatives) can be inserted into a genomic locus of 275 interest (Röth et al 2019). Though this technology can be applied with ease, there are 276 certain limitations that exist with the use of the natural auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 277 including its limited solubility in water.…”
Section: Naa Is a Synthetic Alternative To The Natural Auxin Iaa 272mentioning
confidence: 99%