2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2023.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in testing the interference of biocides on stone materials: A comparative analysis and guidelines for a standardised approach

Annalaura Casanova Municchia,
Maria Rosaria Fidanza,
Giulia Caneva
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We preliminarily observed and investigated the physical properties of the 4 selected lithotypes after the application of the different coating formulations (a total of 90 samples). Following the most used interference tests [32], we specifically examined whether these products induced alterations in the surface optical properties that might result in a noticeable color change (measured by ∆E) perceivable to the human eye, potentially affecting the perception variation in hypothetically treated artifacts. Colorimetric measurements were carried out on three different points for each sample, and average values of L*, a*, and b* were obtained for each sample group (untreated, coating only, and the two systems of nanosystems with the two tested biocides: NC-MBT, MNP-MBT, NC-ZOS, and MNP-ZOS).…”
Section: Coating Development and Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We preliminarily observed and investigated the physical properties of the 4 selected lithotypes after the application of the different coating formulations (a total of 90 samples). Following the most used interference tests [32], we specifically examined whether these products induced alterations in the surface optical properties that might result in a noticeable color change (measured by ∆E) perceivable to the human eye, potentially affecting the perception variation in hypothetically treated artifacts. Colorimetric measurements were carried out on three different points for each sample, and average values of L*, a*, and b* were obtained for each sample group (untreated, coating only, and the two systems of nanosystems with the two tested biocides: NC-MBT, MNP-MBT, NC-ZOS, and MNP-ZOS).…”
Section: Coating Development and Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, biocide application 2 of 17 cannot have a long-lasting efficiency, and repetitive use may result in microbial resistance, leading to a resurgence of microbes on treated surfaces [23,29,30]. Moreover, their potential risks to human health and the environment, as well as substrate interference [31,32], have prompted a quest for alternative ecofriendly solutions [33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biocides can be classified according to several aspects, including their chemical nature, the target organisms, the mode of action and the type of formulation; they must also meet specific requirements to be applied in the treatment of works of art, such as high efficacy against biodeteriogens, absence of interference with the materials and low toxicity to human health and the environment [33,34]. The application of traditional biocides can give rise to potential risks for human health and for the environment, demanding cautious assessment of their acute and chronic toxicity [19,20,25,27,[34][35][36]. In any country, regulations exist for the marketing and use of biocides against harmful organisms, to protect humans, animals, plants and materials, such as for Europe with the "Biocidal Product Regulation", BPR (Regulation 528/2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%