2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in the computation of the Sjöstrand, Rossi, and Feynman distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present article, the authors propose a new method of designing the quasi-mono-isotopic detector set for a new subcritical reactor. The method is based on: -precise computer calculations of the reactor eigenvalue -k kcode and delayed neutron fraction - (using MCNP KCODE) and multiple simulations of the Sjöstrand experiment for all planned detector positions and for several possible sensitive detector materials (using the Talamo et al methodology [10]), resulting in values of k eff and differences  k kcode  k eff . As a result, for each detector position, a sensitive material with the lowest absolute value of  is selected, and from multiple evaluations, the most frequently selected material for a given position/detector is proposed for application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present article, the authors propose a new method of designing the quasi-mono-isotopic detector set for a new subcritical reactor. The method is based on: -precise computer calculations of the reactor eigenvalue -k kcode and delayed neutron fraction - (using MCNP KCODE) and multiple simulations of the Sjöstrand experiment for all planned detector positions and for several possible sensitive detector materials (using the Talamo et al methodology [10]), resulting in values of k eff and differences  k kcode  k eff . As a result, for each detector position, a sensitive material with the lowest absolute value of  is selected, and from multiple evaluations, the most frequently selected material for a given position/detector is proposed for application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, detector positions in the well-defi ned reactor computer model should be proposed. Then, in the optimization procedure, from a set of fi ssile and fi ssionable nuclides and possibly other materials like natural uranium, 10 B, and others, one nuclide or material for each detector is selected. The computer simulation of Sjöstrand area method experiment is used to fi nd a detector response for each material of the assumed set.…”
Section: Monoisotopic Chambersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer simulations of the Sjo ¨strand method experiments should be used to determine the detector response for each material and for all detectors and their positions in the reactor. Numerical simulations were carried out as described in [14] and [9], assuming the detector positions shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Mono Isotopic Chambersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is exhibited in experimental ADS, where measurements of neutron fluxes show that the properties of the proton source used for producing spallation neutrons strongly influence the time and spatial distributions of neutrons within the core [10]. In general, an approach with an explicit time dependence may be required, for instance when assessing the effect of security devices or when studying the impact of the protron source on the critical properties of the nuclear core [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiplication factor characterizing the growth of neutron fluxes is defined from this time evolution operator. The question then arises of relating the corresponding properties of neutron fluxes, which can be locally measured, to the parameters which characterize the global state of the nuclear core in a time independent way, in particular with respect to criticality [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%