2014
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in the healing of flexor tendon injuries

Abstract: The intrasynovial flexor tendons of the hand are critical for normal hand function. Injury to these tendons can result in absent finger flexion, and a subsequent loss of overall hand function. The surgical techniques used to repair these tendons have improved in the past few decades, as have the postoperative rehabilitation protocols. In spite of these advances, intrasynovial flexor tendon repairs continue to be plagued by postoperative scar formation, which limits tendon gliding and prevents a full functional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although early active mobilisation for rehabilitation post flexor tendon repair is more prominently supported by current medical evidence 7 , a recent United States (US) survey, to evaluate current management trends, found that only 50.5% (207 of 410) of surgeons opt for the use of an early active protocol, whilst the remaining 49.5% (203 of 410) still prefer an early passive protocol 7 . A lack of an established 'gold standard' in rehabilitation of a repaired flexor tendon 3 , has led many therapists currently in practice to combine existing concepts from multiple sources to create combination protocols, that meet patient and context needs 8 . With no conclusive evidence around optimal rehabilitation protocols for this complex injury, there is an ongoing need for research to address the poor functional outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although early active mobilisation for rehabilitation post flexor tendon repair is more prominently supported by current medical evidence 7 , a recent United States (US) survey, to evaluate current management trends, found that only 50.5% (207 of 410) of surgeons opt for the use of an early active protocol, whilst the remaining 49.5% (203 of 410) still prefer an early passive protocol 7 . A lack of an established 'gold standard' in rehabilitation of a repaired flexor tendon 3 , has led many therapists currently in practice to combine existing concepts from multiple sources to create combination protocols, that meet patient and context needs 8 . With no conclusive evidence around optimal rehabilitation protocols for this complex injury, there is an ongoing need for research to address the poor functional outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite intensive research activity on these topics, little clinical evidence exists except for the controlled mobilization, which is a type of biophysical stimulation. None of the other regenerative medicine approaches has been implemented in human clinical trials or clinical practice to date (Sammer andChung, 2014, Yang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Repair Of Flexor Tendon Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both follow similar stages to other tissues including inflammation lasting 48-72 h, fibroblast proliferation, collagen production for 3-4 weeks, and remodeling involving cross-linking and reduction of type III collagen with fiber reorientation ( 3 ). Extrinsic healing is characterized by rapid influx of fibroblasts from the peritendinous tissues, which favors the formation of adhesions, and intrinsic healing occurs through fibroblasts originating in the endotendon, without the formation of adhesions and which by early mobilization stimulates the synovial pumps, with a higher resistance on the suture line ( 4 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%