We have read with great interest the recently published article by Fernades et al 1 in Menopause. The trial compares the effects of fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy, radiofrequency, and promestriene on the histomorphometric parameters of the vulvar vestibule of breast cancer survivors on adjuvant endocrine therapy. They concluded that all groups delivered comparable, significant symptom improvements, although the prevalence of pretreatment atrophic tissue was limited.Despite the scientific merit of this study, we noticed that, besides the vulvar vestibule histomorphometric evaluation being the outcome, histological vulvar atrophy was identified in only four (5.7%) of the pretreatment vulvar samples, two of whom were in the promestriene group. We also noted that not all participants (91.4%) were in the postmenopausal stage, the mean age in the promestriene group was higher than in radiofrequency (with statistical significance) and in CO 2 laser groups, and there was no sham-controlled group.Previously, Li et al 2 randomized 49 postmenopausal women with vaginal symptoms to either laser or sham treatment. Pretreatment histologic features at vaginal biopsy were type 2 (poorly estrogenized) in 22% (11) and type 3 (combination of well and poorly estrogenized mucosae) in 51% (25) of participants. They concluded that the histologic effect on vaginal tissue was not significantly different between groups and fractional CO 2 laser should not be recommended for clinical use for postmenopausal vaginal symptoms.A 2023 double-blind, sham-controlled trial of women on aromatase inhibitors randomly assigned to 5 monthly sessions of laser or sham laser therapy. At 6 months, both groups showed improvement with regard to patient-reported symptoms, vaginal health indices, quality of life scores, and histologic comparisons with no significant difference between groups. The two interventions were well tolerated, but tolerance was significantly lower in the CO 2 laser group. 3 For women with breast cancer on endocrine therapy with persistent symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause after nonhormone treatment, the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends the use of low-dose vaginal estrogen and recommends against energy-based vaginal treatments. 4 Energy-based devices such as CO 2 lasers are being marketed specifically to patients with breast cancer, but the lack of quality research demonstrating the benefits and an ongoing concern for patient harm should dissuade clinicians from directing patients toward these therapies. 4 This practice received strong criticism from the Food and Drug Administration. 5 Additional randomized, prospective, sham-controlled trials of adequate size and scope are recommended before these therapies can be routinely used for genitourinary syndrome of menopause treatment.