2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances made in removing paraquat herbicide by adsorption technology: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regulated maximum release limit for PQ in natural water is 100 ppb (3.9 × 10 − 7 M) according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) [62]. The maximum residue of PQ in food under the Chinese standard is 0.2 mg/L (0.78 μM) in food [63]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Actual Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regulated maximum release limit for PQ in natural water is 100 ppb (3.9 × 10 − 7 M) according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) [62]. The maximum residue of PQ in food under the Chinese standard is 0.2 mg/L (0.78 μM) in food [63]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Actual Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the increasing application rates of isoxaflutole accelerated by the cultivation of isoxaflutole-resistant GM soy, its chemical load on the environment increases, yet environmental accumulation risk has not been attributed to the a.i. In cases of severe environmental pollution with pesticide a.i.s causing persistent or cumulating contamination, not only the environmental fate and toxicology of the substance, but potential means of remediation are needed to be assessed, as seen, e.g., in the case of paraquat [ 40 ] or glyphosate [ 32 , 41 , 42 ]. The environmental status of isoxaflutole is fortunately not as unfavorable, apparently manageable by certain application restrictions, and therefore the feasibility of remediation is uncalled for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 25 ] Adsorption has been regarded as one of the most effective methods for removing dyes because of its straightforward design, high efficacy, ease of handling, and low cost. [ 26–29 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25] Adsorption has been regarded as one of the most effective methods for removing dyes because of its straightforward design, high efficacy, ease of handling, and low cost. [26][27][28][29] In the literature, it is possible to find several studies that synthesize adsorbents from residues for dye removal, such as phaseolus vulgaris L. for the removal of reactive red 198 dye, [30] coir pith, sawdust, and sugarcane fibre for the removal of crystal violet and rhodamine B, [31] sesame hull (Sesamum indicum L.) for the removal of methylene blue (MB), [32] soybean hull for the removal of safranin dye, [33] Musa acuminata and Solanum tuberosum peels for emerald green dye removal, [34] Bengal gram bean husk for removing MB and methylene orange (MO), [35] Citrullus Lanatus peels for removing acidic dyes, [36] pecan pericarp (Carya illinoensis) for removing methyl violet 2B, [37] and a pod of forest species [38,39] and tree bark [40,41] in the removal of cationic dyes, among others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%