“…To first understand the pharmaceutical significance of AMPs, it needs to be stressed that the use of peptide-based drugs has numerous advantages, such as high potency, selectivity, and low toxicity. − Peptides, compared to small-molecule drugs such as bestatin, bacitracin, vinblastine, and others, can be more specific for their target, so they have fewer side effects, and because of their short half-life are less likely to accumulate in tissues. − However, the development of peptide-based drugs also presents numerous limitations, such as metabolic instability due to cleavage by proteolytic enzymes and high sensitivity to physicochemical changes such as temperature and pH, poor absorption, and limited membrane permeability as a result of the presence of charge and hydrophilic or polar amino acids. Chemical modifications are the most common solutions to overcome these limitations at the expense of increasing production costs. , In addition, approving new drugs, in which peptides are not an exception, is a long process, usually requiring a minimum of 10 to 15 years and compliance with demanding regulatory standards. − In this sense, and despite the marked increase in clinical trials using peptides during the last two decades, , the number of studies at this stage is deficient, especially when considering the exponential ratio in which new AMPs are described yearly. ,, To make the matter more complicated, about 40% of the AMP-based drugs in clinical trials are of human origin, often leading to the development of endogenous resistance mechanisms. , Thus, AMPs from other natural sources, such as microorganisms, insects, marine organisms, and amphibians, represent promising avenues of pharmaceutical investigation (Table , Figure ).…”