2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances of deep learning applications in ground-penetrating radar: A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last decade, most of the efforts in GPR developments within this application field include new processing techniques and methodologies for 3D reconstruction and visualization, machine learning techniques for automatic detection (mainly objects with a circular section such as bars and pipes, but also cracks), and data digitization into GIS models [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. Moreover, new multi-antenna systems and array multi-channel antennas have been developed, thus allowing for a dense 3D data collection [68], thus reducing the surveying time and increasing the productivity.…”
Section: Gpr Applications In Civil Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade, most of the efforts in GPR developments within this application field include new processing techniques and methodologies for 3D reconstruction and visualization, machine learning techniques for automatic detection (mainly objects with a circular section such as bars and pipes, but also cracks), and data digitization into GIS models [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. Moreover, new multi-antenna systems and array multi-channel antennas have been developed, thus allowing for a dense 3D data collection [68], thus reducing the surveying time and increasing the productivity.…”
Section: Gpr Applications In Civil Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger databases are compiled and used in the study of pavement distress using deep learning methods, showing that the frequency of the antenna also affects the results because of the detail loss [252]. In [253] a review of deep learning applications in GPR is presented, comparing the results and grouping the works depending on the type of data used. The conclusion is that the methods using A-scans [254,255] present slightly better results than those using B-scans [252,256] or C-scans [257,258].…”
Section: Recent Developments and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding, this processing requires more complex architecture and a large volume of datasets. The optimal solution to achieve a proper development in the deep learning based on C-scans is to create a big GPR dataset, sharing data from research around the world [253].…”
Section: Recent Developments and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversion and migration approaches (e.g., [12,13]) were developed based on Maxwell's equations to eliminate signal interference, but excessive derivative and integral calculations are time-consuming. Machine learning (e.g., [14,15]) provides automatic approaches for target identification from radargrams, but required considerable datasets with similar underground attributes are difficult to acquire from field measurement. Jin and Duan [16] developed a discrete grid method to eliminate hyperbolic interference in rock detection, but with many parameters determined by experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%