2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing AKIS with assemblage thinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social dynamics and prevailing cultures within AKISs form contexts that may inhibit-as in the two examined cases-or stimulate the dynamic capabilities of a system. Historicity, referring to paths of innovation development in a region or context [65], as well as traditionally adopted roles and relations between actors [87], can also play a negative or positive role in supporting AKISs' capacity to facilitate digital transformation. Since our analysis did not focus on this dimension of AKISs, future research can investigate how previous innovation experiences shape current attempts of AKISs to facilitate digitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social dynamics and prevailing cultures within AKISs form contexts that may inhibit-as in the two examined cases-or stimulate the dynamic capabilities of a system. Historicity, referring to paths of innovation development in a region or context [65], as well as traditionally adopted roles and relations between actors [87], can also play a negative or positive role in supporting AKISs' capacity to facilitate digital transformation. Since our analysis did not focus on this dimension of AKISs, future research can investigate how previous innovation experiences shape current attempts of AKISs to facilitate digitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Greece, AKIS actors operate without central coordination since the public sector's contribution to the system is limited [63], while cooperation among them is not the norm [64]. In that framework, the ability of the AKIS to support agricultural innovation is limited [65]. The Italian AKIS is more decentralized and pluralistic, involving different categories of actors [64] and adequately supporting facets of innovation [66] but lacking robust mechanisms that support continuous value creation for farmers [67].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lawrence et al [9] proposed the concept of a Forestry Knowledge and Innovation System (FOKIS) to better fit the forestry context. Klerkx and Begemann [10] developed the concept of a Missionoriented Agricultural Innovation System (MAIS), and Sutherland et al [14] proposed the use of a Micro-AKIS to capture the knowledge and innovation systems at the farm level. The adaptation that this study proposes, which is to integrate a "policy transition" aspect into the AKIS framework, arises from the need to improve the ET ecosystems in the AFF sectors that are not able to innovate a sustainable transition of these sectors and do not reflect their needs.…”
Section: Literature Review and The Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education, as a cross-cutting theme, is often involved in the AKIS literature [11,[14][15][16]] but is rarely the main focus of research [17]. Moreover, even less emphasis is placed on vocational education and training (VET) and lifelong learning (LLL).…”
Section: Literature Review and The Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the AKIS framework, a multitude of participatory and group-based agri-advisory service strategies have emerged globally (Black, 2000). However, even within this framework, it is recognised that, in AKIS, the farmer still plays a relatively passive role (Pigford et al, 2018;Sutherland et al, 2023).…”
Section: Transitioning To Sustainable Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%