Advancing an understanding of design cognition and design metacognition: Progress and prospects

Ball, Linden J.; Christensen, Bo T.

doi:10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.003

Cited by 90 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 98 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The tool was specifically designed for the simulation as a low‐fidelity, text‐based form interface and used a workflow to manage each step of the process. We used the double divergent‐convergent approach to idea generation as the basis of the simulation steps (Cropley, 2006), implemented problem framing (Schon and Wiggins, 1992), and attempted to create the strategic design process as noted by Ball and Christensen (2019).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulating the Cognitive Leap Using Brainwriting

Langham

Paulsen

2020

Design Management Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Idea generation and brainstorming are most effective when conducted in groups and in person. However, in‐person co‐creation activities have many limitations. The digital environment provides opportunities to ideate remotely and to enhance creativity. We designed an online experiment to assess the impact of brainwriting on the effectiveness of ideation. Our intention was to determine whether remote digital brainstorming could improve ideation, harnessing diversity in experience and knowledge while problem solving. Results revealed that unusual and novel ideas occurred in approximately 53 percent of cases using our simulated environment. Compared to the presession control activity, ideas generated were more sophisticated and included improvement in all cases. Our experiment demonstrates that digital brainwriting can significantly improve the quality and quantity of new ideas.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulating the Cognitive Leap Using Brainwriting

Langham

Paulsen

2020

Design Management Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Este processo é complexo e em algumas situações até labiríntico (DUBBERLY, 2004) e são necessárias formas eficientes de se mapear o processo para que a equipe toda possa acompanhá-lo (BRAVO; BOHEMIA, 2019). Outro aspecto desafiador é a condução do processo, que envolve uma camada de meta-cognição sobre o processo de projeto, ou seja, além de entender o que está sendo projetado, é necessário compreender o processo pelo qual esta atividade está sendo feita (BALL;CHRISTENSEN, 2019;DORST, 2015). Mas além do que ocorre normalmente no projeto, esta compreensão deve se dar para o time como um todo, e não apenas para um projetista individualmente (ZAHEDI; HEATON, 2017).…”

Section: O Desafio De Futuros Compartilhadosunclassified

Design, Neurociência E Educação: Cenários Inovadores No Ensino E Aprendizagem De Projeto

Borges¹,

Sbruzzi²

2021

Divergências E Convergências: Arquitetura, Urbanismo E Design

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Direitos para esta edição cedidos à Atena Editora pelos autores. Todo o conteúdo deste livro está licenciado sob uma Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons. Atribuição-Não-Comercial-NãoDerivativos 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).O conteúdo dos artigos e seus dados em sua forma, correção e confiabilidade são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores, inclusive não representam necessariamente a posição oficial da Atena Editora. Permitido o download da obra e o compartilhamento desde que sejam atribuídos créditos aos autores, mas sem a possibilidade de alterá-la de nenhuma forma ou utilizá-la para fins comerciais.Todos os manuscritos foram previamente submetidos à avaliação cega pelos pares, membros do Conselho Editorial desta Editora, tendo sido aprovados para a publicação.A Atena Editora é comprometida em garantir a integridade editorial em todas as etapas do processo de publicação. Situações suspeitas de má conduta científica serão investigadas sob o mais alto padrão de rigor acadêmico e ético.

show abstract

“…In terms of analysis, protocol studies typically rely on detailed statistical analysis, drawing on variance analysis. This has resulted in, for example, work on design cognition highlighting conjecture-based problem formulation, problem solution co-evolution, analogical reasoning, mental simulation, fixated solution generation Ball & Christensen, 2019) and the role of uncertainty perception in the design process (Cash & Kreye, 2018).…”

Section: Protocol Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Future of Design Process Research? Exploring Process Theory and Methodology

Wegener

Cash²

2020

Proceedings of DRS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design processes are at the heart of design research. Current design research at the micro-and macro-level has led to profound insights about designing. However, missing are design process research approaches that are able to theorize between (meso-level) and beyond levels of analysis. This fragmentation of process research and theory across levels hampers research synthesis and theory development. In this paper we illustrate the limitations of current design research methodologies to analyse and theorize process. Specifically, the issue lies in the challenge of analysing and theorizing the temporal embeddedness of data in the overall design process. We introduce a Process Theory agenda for future design process research focused on the meso-levels as the mediator of interactions between design processes across levels. As such, this paper contributes a novel characterisation of a critical challenge in design research, proposing process theory for addressing this.

show abstract

Advancing an understanding of design cognition and design metacognition: Progress and prospects

Cited by 90 publications

References 98 publications

Simulating the Cognitive Leap Using Brainwriting

Simulating the Cognitive Leap Using Brainwriting

Design, Neurociência E Educação: Cenários Inovadores No Ensino E Aprendizagem De Projeto

The Future of Design Process Research? Exploring Process Theory and Methodology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About