Advancing bee conservation in the US: gaps and opportunities in data collection and reporting

Abstract

IntroductionBee conservation in the US is currently hindered by challenges associated with assessing the status and trends of a diverse group of >3000 species, many of which are rare, endemic to small areas, and/or exhibit high inter-annual variationin population size. Fundamental information about the distribution of most species across space and time, thus, is lacking yet urgently needed to assess population status, guide conservation plans, and prioritize actions among species and geographies.MethodsUsing wild bee data from two public data repositories representing the contiguous US, we evaluated the availability and sufficiency of data for use in species assessments of wild bees. We also examined the number of bee species recorded in each US state and the proportion of species with recent records (2012–2021).ResultsAlthough efforts to monitor bees continue to grow, there remains a massive paucity of data. Exceedingly few records (0.04%)reported both sampling protocol and effort, greatly limiting the usefulness of the data. Few species or locations have adequate publicly available data to support analyses of population status or trends, and fewer than half of species have sufficient data to delineate geographic range. Despite an exponential increase in data submissions since the 2000s, only 47% of species were reported within the last decade, which may be driven by how data are collected, reported, and shared, or may reflect troubling patterns of local or large-scale declines and extirpations.DiscussionBased on our analysis, we provide recommendations to improve the quality and quantity of data that can be used to detect, understand, and respond to changes in wild bee populations.

Fine-Scale Models of Bee Species Diversity and Habitat in New York State

“…Our work shows the feasibility of developing fine-scale maps for guiding conservation of data-limited taxa like bees, despite insufficient historical survey effort, dependence on unstructured collection records, and taxonomic biases (Chesshire et al, 2023;Rousseau et al, 2024). While monitoring programs are taking shape to address these data deficiencies, many large-scale conservation actions are slated to occur by the end of the decade under the 30x30 framework, that strives for 30% of land area to be conserved by 2030 (Dinerstein et al, 2019).…”

Bee monitoring by community scientists: comparing a collections-based program with iNaturalist

“…And more broadly, iNaturalist data are coming to dominate natural history databases. Across the United States, Rousseau et al (2024) found that 92% of bee records on GBIF between 2019 and 2021 were from iNaturalist. However, these numbers may be biased in part because many records from other sources collected during those years may not be processed and digitized yet.…”