Implementing Mental Health Promotion 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23455-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing Evidence-Based Action for Mental Health Promotion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study adds to the scant literature on implementing culturally informed mental health promotion in Indigenous communities. [ 40 ],notes the importance of evaluating mental health promotion interventions to increase our understanding of implementation process, impacts, outcomes, equity and costs in more uncontrolled “real world” conditions. A strength of this study is that it reflects the perceptions of First Nations community members about a newly developed enhancement to an existing evidence-based programme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study adds to the scant literature on implementing culturally informed mental health promotion in Indigenous communities. [ 40 ],notes the importance of evaluating mental health promotion interventions to increase our understanding of implementation process, impacts, outcomes, equity and costs in more uncontrolled “real world” conditions. A strength of this study is that it reflects the perceptions of First Nations community members about a newly developed enhancement to an existing evidence-based programme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this light, the primary and secondary prevention strategies adopted by our WIT program are of great practical value in terms of cost-effectiveness. Cost-benefit analyses of mental health services generally indicate that primary and secondary prevention strategies are relatively cost-effective (Harper and Balch, 1975; Barry et al, 2009), as their implementation costs are typically much lower than those of interventions at the tertiary level (Springer and Phillips, 2007). Other findings similarly show that secondary prevention strategies restrict the surge in new cases of psychological problems, which in turn decreases overall expenditure and the need for costlier interventions such as psychotherapy (Durlak and Wells, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%