2024
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202309040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing Glucose Sensing Through Auto‐Fluorescent Polymer Brushes: From Surface Design to Nano‐Arrays

Gozde Aktas Eken,
Yuming Huang,
Oswald Prucker
et al.

Abstract: Designing smart (bio)interfaces with the capability to sense and react to changes in local environments offers intriguing possibilities for new surface‐based sensing devices and technologies. Polymer brushes make ideal materials to design such adaptive and responsive interfaces given their large variety of functional and structural possibilities as well as their outstanding abilities to respond to physical, chemical, and biological stimuli. Herein, a practical sensory interface for glucose detection based on a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This point could be verified through putting the MIM FP cavity into the electrolytic cell to real-time monitor pH distribution during water splitting reaction (Movie S1, Supporting Information). It is worth mentioning that the response rate of the MIM FP cavity, when compared to other stimuli-responsive material based on bulk polymers reported before, ,, is dramatically enhanced owing to the integration of the responsive polymer brushes, which possesses more flexible chain movement and faster conformational change without the limitation of cross-linked networks. , To further highlight the advantages of the PDMAEMA brushes, we compare the responsive performance of our PDMAEMA brushes-based MIM FP cavity and other hydrogel-based MIM structures reported in state-of-the-art literature, as listed in the Table . It is clear that the PDMAEMA brushes-based MIM cavity exhibits a much faster response rate than the hydrogel-based MIM cavities in the previously reported literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This point could be verified through putting the MIM FP cavity into the electrolytic cell to real-time monitor pH distribution during water splitting reaction (Movie S1, Supporting Information). It is worth mentioning that the response rate of the MIM FP cavity, when compared to other stimuli-responsive material based on bulk polymers reported before, ,, is dramatically enhanced owing to the integration of the responsive polymer brushes, which possesses more flexible chain movement and faster conformational change without the limitation of cross-linked networks. , To further highlight the advantages of the PDMAEMA brushes, we compare the responsive performance of our PDMAEMA brushes-based MIM FP cavity and other hydrogel-based MIM structures reported in state-of-the-art literature, as listed in the Table . It is clear that the PDMAEMA brushes-based MIM cavity exhibits a much faster response rate than the hydrogel-based MIM cavities in the previously reported literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%