2018
DOI: 10.1177/0706743718772520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing Integrated Care through Psychiatric Workforce Development: A Systematic Review of Educational Interventions to Train Psychiatrists in Integrated Care

Abstract: Similar to integrated care clinical interventions, integrated care training is important yet difficult to achieve. Educational initiatives could benefit from faculty development, quality improvement to synergistically improve care and training, and stronger evaluation. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014010295.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the literature describing educational models for outpatient CL experiences is limited, with only 17 articles meeting the search criteria (Table 3). 18,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] We found 10 articles describing individual integrated care programs 18,28,31,32,34,36,38,39,42 and 2 articles providing guidelines on core competencies for integrated care for trainees. 30,40 As shown in Table 2, the educational opportunities for integrated psychiatric care ranged from colocated services and collaborative care to dedicated outpatient psychiatric clinics for the medically ill. Only 3 of the articles describe training opportunities for advanced psychiatric trainees including 2 for CL fellows and one for child and adolescent fellows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, the literature describing educational models for outpatient CL experiences is limited, with only 17 articles meeting the search criteria (Table 3). 18,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] We found 10 articles describing individual integrated care programs 18,28,31,32,34,36,38,39,42 and 2 articles providing guidelines on core competencies for integrated care for trainees. 30,40 As shown in Table 2, the educational opportunities for integrated psychiatric care ranged from colocated services and collaborative care to dedicated outpatient psychiatric clinics for the medically ill. Only 3 of the articles describe training opportunities for advanced psychiatric trainees including 2 for CL fellows and one for child and adolescent fellows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review evaluated 9 published and 5 unpublished interventions to train psychiatry residents in integrated care. 41 The outcomes in all of these interventions were variable and of low-to-moderate quality, and the main conclusions that could be drawn from the outcomes were successful buy-in to the integrated care model and positive learner experience in providing integrated care. 41 A summary of 5 psychiatry training programs that provided integrated care training for residents found that the success of such programs depended on the presence of a supervising psychiatrist with experience in integrated care, funding for faculty time, time within the residency program, office space within the clinical site, and a clinic "champion" who supports integrated care.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Team instability and frequent staff turnover led to the loss of skills and knowledge hardwon over time [55]. Lack of involvement in some teams may have reflected little interest in the model or doubts about its capacity to improve skills [61]. Regarding the difficulty of managing patients without family doctors, the 2005-2010 Quebec MH Action Plan [65] had recommended two GP per 100,000 inhabitants in MH-PCT, but this target had not been reached.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the systemlevel these included supportive legislative/policy environment [25,54], availability of appropriate resources [55], preexisting relationships between specialized MH services and primary care [22,56], and adequate incentives [25,[57][58][59]. Organizational-level issues included clinician acceptance of the model [60,61], team stability [55], organizational support [1,62,63], leadership [55,62], and feedback on model effectiveness [59]. Finally, individual-level concerns included interest among GP in MHD [1,25,59,63], and individual qualities of psychiatrists [58,60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%