2021
DOI: 10.1080/20442041.2020.1816421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing lake and reservoir water quality management with near-term, iterative ecological forecasting

Abstract: Near-term, iterative ecological forecasts with quantified uncertainty have great potential for improving lake and reservoir management. For example, if managers received a forecast indicating a high likelihood of impending impairment, they could make decisions today to prevent or mitigate poor water quality in the future. Increasing the number of automated, realtime freshwater forecasts used for management requires integrating interdisciplinary expertise to develop a framework that seamlessly links data, model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is increasing consensus among scientists as to what represent best practices that should be followed when producing, evaluating, and communicating ecological forecasts (Dietze et al 2018, Harris et al 2018, White et al 2019, Carey et al 2021. Some of those practices have been at the core of this work and we discussed their importance extensively in previous sections, including explicitly accounting for and propagating multiple sources of uncertainty, such as observation and process uncertainty, identifying better predictor variables that are expected to relate to the forecast endpoint, using the model to make both short-and long-term predictions to accommodate the time scales of management decisions while also using short-term forecasts to facilitate evaluation of model performance, and routinely assessing and updating the model with new data (Dietze et al 2018, Harris et al 2018, White et al 2019.…”
Section: Forecasting Best Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is increasing consensus among scientists as to what represent best practices that should be followed when producing, evaluating, and communicating ecological forecasts (Dietze et al 2018, Harris et al 2018, White et al 2019, Carey et al 2021. Some of those practices have been at the core of this work and we discussed their importance extensively in previous sections, including explicitly accounting for and propagating multiple sources of uncertainty, such as observation and process uncertainty, identifying better predictor variables that are expected to relate to the forecast endpoint, using the model to make both short-and long-term predictions to accommodate the time scales of management decisions while also using short-term forecasts to facilitate evaluation of model performance, and routinely assessing and updating the model with new data (Dietze et al 2018, Harris et al 2018, White et al 2019.…”
Section: Forecasting Best Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2019, Carey et al. 2021). Guided by recent appreciation for the spatial distribution of nutrient sources that affect the Bay’s water quality, how loads have changed over time, and the complex intra‐annual variability in hypoxia, we explore how model performance changes when different combinations of HV metrics, TN load sources, and TN load time windows are used as calibration inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The goal of the work presented in [33] is the implementation of near-term and iterative ecological predictions for freshwater management. A forecasting framework named FLARE was developed to help manage water quality in critical lakes and reservoir ecosystems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in a number of lake water quality studies (e.g. Carey et al, 2021;Thomas et al, 2020), but seasonal time-scales have not been addressed to our knowledge. The focus of the WATExR project, a European Union (EU) project funded by ERA4CS, was therefore to help address this gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%