2019 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/issrew.2019.00060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing Monitoring in Microservices Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 9 shows the research on trace, log, and metric 39,40 in the field of microservices. Among them, trace monitoring system 2,39–47 is the most studied, accounting for 38% of the total collected research literature. The 34% of the studies involve mmonitoring 12,39,48–55 .…”
Section: Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 9 shows the research on trace, log, and metric 39,40 in the field of microservices. Among them, trace monitoring system 2,39–47 is the most studied, accounting for 38% of the total collected research literature. The 34% of the studies involve mmonitoring 12,39,48–55 .…”
Section: Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trace monitoring is mainly through tracking, collecting and analyzing the information of the call link to quickly check the fault problems and determine the critical path of the application service. 39 Trace monitoring methods are mainly divided into passive tracking [42][43][44] and active tracking. 2,41,[45][46][47] The main difference is that the active tracking method needs a certain degree of intervention to target system, and even affect the running state of it, such as Dapper active tracking method, proposed by Google, code onto the target system by plugging piles, so as to obtain the service link information and the active link tracking.…”
Section: Migration Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A framework for IoT system monitoring and management that combines AllJoyn open-source project (interconnecting IoT devices), MongoDB (Big Data storage), and Storm (real-time data analytics) is proposed in [50]. This work also highlighted how the proposed system helps addressing the limitations of AllJoyn in terms of large-scale EMMCS Edge [34] ZerOps4E Edge [35] FMonE Edge [36] SmartX MVF Cloud [37] CLAMBS Cloud [38] Monitoring cloud Cloud [39] M2CPA Cloud [40] CL-SLAM Cloud [41] CloudProcMon Cloud [42] Self-adaptive monitoring Cloud [43] Network-aware monitoring Cloud [44] Monasca Cloud [45] Instana Kibana Visualization [55] Black-box Monitoring Microservices [56] Non-intrusive techniques Microservices [57] M3 Microservices [58] milliScope Microservices [59] QoE framework Microservices [60] Cilium (Hubble) Microservices [61] ViperProbe Microservices [62] The rise of eBPF Microservices [63] System visibility and security Microservices [64] Container network observability Microservices [65] Apache SkyWalking Microservices [66] OpenTelemetry smart environment monitoring and Big data storage and analytics. CHARISMA [51] discusses the key features of monitoring as well as the main requirements to resource monitoring systems for future 5G deployments and services.…”
Section: A Contributions From Academiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution claims to be transparent to applications and generates less overhead than state-of-the-art black-box systems. Cinque et al [56] presented their proposal for a unique monitoring framework with non-intrusive techniques based on passive tracing and log analysis to address challenges in current application performance monitoring. A generic monitoring framework Multi-microservices Multi-virtualization Multi-cloud (M3) [57] is introduced to monitor the performance of microservices deployed over heterogeneous virtualization platforms in a multi-cloud environment.…”
Section: A Contributions From Academiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation