Advancing Qualitative Meta-Analyses: A Realist and a Constructivist Approach

Habersang, Stefanie; Reihlen, Markus

doi:10.5465/ambpp.2018.129

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This position helped us refine Hoon's () original landmark contribution. However, we recognize that distinctive philosophical underpinnings inspire different practices in our profession, and engaging in a more in‐depth debate, particularly about different powerful approaches to qualitative meta‐analysis and the ways in which they can be improved to acquire cumulative knowledge about particular phenomena, may be overdue (see Habersang and Reihlen, ; Thorne et al, ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Process Perspective on Organizational Failure: A Qualitative Meta‐Analysis

Habersang

Küberling-Jost

Reihlen

et al. 2018

J Management Studies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An important stream of the organizational failure literature has proposed process models to describe how firms fail. Despite much progress, this stream is currently at a crossroads. Previous process models try to capture how failure unfolds in singular models that describe organizational failure as the result of either inertia or extremism or as a mixture of both. However, it remains unclear how these competing explanations are related and what underlying mechanisms explain why organizational failure processes unfold as they do. We address these issues by examining failure processes using a qualitative meta‐analysis research design. The qualitative meta‐analysis allows us to analyse and synthesize the wealth of previously published single‐case studies in order to develop process models of organizational failure. The most salient finding of our analysis is that failure processes converge around four distinct process archetypes, which we name imperialist, laggard, villain, and politicized. Each process archetype can be explained by the interplay of distinct rigidity and conflict mechanisms. Differentiating the four process archetypes and explaining the underlying mechanisms helps to resolve some contradictions in the previous failure process literature.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Process Perspective on Organizational Failure: A Qualitative Meta‐Analysis

Habersang

Küberling-Jost

Reihlen

et al. 2018

J Management Studies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This study is a qualitative descriptive analysis utilizing a phenomenological methodology. This study's data gathering method is based on a library study/literature review, with documents pertinent to the research issue serving as sources (Habersang & Reihlen, 2018).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Islamic Law Perspective in the Application of My Pertamina as a Non-Cash Payment System and Control of Fuel Subsidy Flow

Apriantoro

Sabila²,

Rosyadhi³

2022

JTL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of this study is to determine the flow of non-cash payments utilizing the My Pertamina application and the maslahah mursalah perspective. This study employs a literature review or literature study with secondary data sources from journals, books, theses, theses, dissertations, and websites that give credible data for qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of the study indicate that the flow of payments using the My Pertamina application can be made in cash or non-cash using the LinkAja application or a debit/credit card, and the application of the My Pertamina application as a non-cash payment system for purchasing fuel at gas stations is not appropriate from the perspective of maslahah mursalah. Because some requirements for the adoption of maslahah mursalah as Islamic law legislation cannot yet be satisfied. The purpose of this research is to gain a better understanding of the flow of non-cash payments and their application in the My Pertamina application in terms of the benefits of the mursalah, so that My Pertamina can realize the benefits of the mursalah for the broader community and innovate in the future to increase the level of public trust in the My Pertamina application.

show abstract

“…Third, we extend the path dependence theory in theorising CSIR by incorporating behavioural theories across micro, meso, and macro levels. Finally, we respond to the call for qualitative research that focuses on the ‘process’ of how and why CSIR has emerged, deployed and reproduced over time (Habersang & Reihlen, 2018). Both theory building from cases and path dependence theory focus on the dynamic process rather than the outcome variance (Eisenhardt et al, 2016; Sydow et al, 2009, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards theorising corporate social irresponsibility: The Déjà Vu cases of collapsed forestry ventures

Leung

Ng²,

Hoepner

et al. 2023

Business Ethics Env & Resp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on case studies and secondary data, this study theorises how and why firms engage in corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR). Using the inductive process of theory building based on case studies of two forestry companies operating in China, this study explains how and why organisations with initial intentions towards corporate social responsibility (CSR) engage in CSIR based on paths taken and the behaviours across micro (individual), meso (organisational), and macro (industry) levels. Hence, there is a ‘grey zone’ between CSR and CSIR (Clark, C. E., Riera, M., & Iborra, M. (2021). Business & Society, 61, 1473–1511. 10.1177/00076503211015911). This study extends the path dependence literature on CSIR (Küberling‐Jost, J.A. (2019). Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3), 579–601) by integrating moral disengagement and the theory of planned behaviour, stakeholder agency, and institutional theory into path dependence theory based on observed behaviours across micro, meso, and macro levels.

show abstract

Advancing Qualitative Meta-Analyses: A Realist and a Constructivist Approach

Cited by 9 publications

References 23 publications

A Process Perspective on Organizational Failure: A Qualitative Meta‐Analysis

A Process Perspective on Organizational Failure: A Qualitative Meta‐Analysis

Islamic Law Perspective in the Application of My Pertamina as a Non-Cash Payment System and Control of Fuel Subsidy Flow

Towards theorising corporate social irresponsibility: The Déjà Vu cases of collapsed forestry ventures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About