2002
DOI: 10.1017/s1138741600005850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advantage for Emotional Words in Immediate and Delayed Memory Tasks: Could it be Explained in Terms of Processing Capacity?

Abstract: Emotional stimuli are better remembered and recognized than neutral ones. This advantage for emotional stimuli has been repeatedly obtained when testing long-term retention. However, there are contradictory results concerning retention of emotional information when short retention intervals are used. The aim of the present study was, on the one hand, to test the effect of retention interval on memory for emotional stimuli (Experiment 1). The results showed that emotional information is better remembered than n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tse and Altarriba (2009) observed higher recall performance for negative word lists relative to neutral word lists, while observing no advantage for positive word lists relative to neutral word lists. Ferré (2002) observed an effect of emotional valence on immediate serial performance within a mixed list design, positive and negative words being recalled more accurately than neutral words.…”
Section: The Impact Of Emotional Semantic Content On Stmmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tse and Altarriba (2009) observed higher recall performance for negative word lists relative to neutral word lists, while observing no advantage for positive word lists relative to neutral word lists. Ferré (2002) observed an effect of emotional valence on immediate serial performance within a mixed list design, positive and negative words being recalled more accurately than neutral words.…”
Section: The Impact Of Emotional Semantic Content On Stmmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Only a few studies previously explored the impact of emotion on word list recall in a STM context, showing no effect of emotion on pure list recall (Kensinger & Corkin, 2003), or showing an effect of positive valence on pure list recall but without controlling for semantic relatedness (Monnier & Syssau, 2006), or showing an effect of emotion on mixed list recall (Ferré, 2002). Contrary to the studies by Kensinger and Corkin, which used only negative words, and by Monnier and Syssau, which used only positive words, the present study used both positive and negative words, and showed indeed the most reliable effect of emotional content on STM recall performance for positive words.…”
Section: The Emotional Valence Effect As New Evidence For Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These early studies found that im mediate testing led to fewer forgotten associations when arousal was low compared to when arousal was high, whereas longer retention intervals reversed this effect. However, later studies did not find any effects of emotion on immediate memory tests (Kebeck & Lohaus, 1986;Sharot & Yonelinas, 2008;Talmi & McGarry, 2012) or found superior memory for emotional stimuli (see Ferre, 2002, for a review). This pattern of findings suggests that while emotional stimuli are better remembered over longer reten tion intervals, their effect on immediate memory is much less consistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely acknowledged that emotion words behave more distinctively than concrete and abstract words (e.g., Altarriba et al 1999;Bauer et al 2009;El-Dakhs and Altarriba 2018). It has also been recurrently reported that emotion words exhibit a processing advantage over neutral words across several cognitive tasks (Ferré 2002;Kazanas and Altarriba 2015a;Kousta et al 2009). These findings have triggered further studies (Kuperman et al 2014;Ponari et al 2015;Sereno et al 2015) that aimed to explore the potential modulating factors of this distinctiveness and processing advantage, such as word frequency, arousal and the participants' mood and L2 status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%