Advantages and Disadvantages of Health Care Accreditation Mod-els

Tabrizi, Jafar Sadegh; Gharibi, Farid; Wilson, Andrew

doi:10.5681/hpp.2011.001

Cited by 22 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Patient-centred models of care, such as the SBI, are costeffective and improve outcomes by actively involving patients in health decisions and ensuring their preferences are heard and acted upon. 6,13,15 This approach leads to better overall health outcomes, increased patient engagement in their own care, and reduced costs. [16][17][18] The Impact of the SBI on Perioperative Care and Patient Support during Emergency Situations Instituted in 2020 at Ankara University's Faculty of Medicine, the SBI overcame initial implementation hurdles to evolve into a crucial instrument in enhancing the calibre of patient-centric perioperative care.…”

Section: The Sbi Has the Following Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Precision Anaesthesia: Advancing Patient-Centered Precision Care Through Repetitive Assessment of PROMs with the Safe Brain Initiative Approach

Meço,

de Agua Reis,

Berger-Estilita

et al. 2023

TJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Main Points• The Safe Brain Initiative (SBI) is an evidence-based project that enhances patient-centred precision anaesthesia by integrating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to monitor and prevent postoperative delirium and neurocognitive disorders.• The SBI employs a comprehensive care bundle comprising 18 core recommendations derived from international guidelines, aiming to address potential complications associated with anaesthesia and surgery, such as postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting.• Preliminary results from the SBI project have shown a notable reduction in postoperative delirium rates and increased awareness among anaesthesia team members regarding patient-related outcomes, indicating the initiative's effectiveness.• The SBI project has gained global traction, with multiple hospitals from various countries participating in the initiative, fostering collaboration, knowledge exchange, and shared experiences to elevate the standards of perioperative care.• By providing healthcare providers anonymous feedback regarding their patients' outcome metrics, they can actively involve patients in their care, leading to better overall health outcomes, increased patient engagement, and reduced costs, contributing to improved patient experiences and continuous quality improvement.

show abstract

Section: The Sbi Has the Following Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Precision Anaesthesia: Advancing Patient-Centered Precision Care Through Repetitive Assessment of PROMs with the Safe Brain Initiative Approach

Meço,

de Agua Reis,

Berger-Estilita

et al. 2023

TJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Accreditation programs are used as a tool for countries to increase the quality of health services, improve clinical conditions and quality of care (Alkhenizan & Shaw, 2011). Considering the various accreditation programs used by Canada, Australia, New Zealand, UK, USA and France, it is seen that the accreditation programs have advantages and disadvantages, and the accreditation programs applied in the USA and Canada are more advantageous (Tabrizi, Gharibi & Wilson, 2011).…”

Section: öZmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of Joint Commission International and Healthcare Information and Management Systems - Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model Measurement Models using Text Mining

Cece¹,

Kose²

2022

SHYD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Health service quality refers to all efforts to prevent a negative outcome in the health status of individuals. For this reason, measuring and evaluating the quality of health services is important to increase the quality of services provided. Aim: In this study, Joint Commission International's (JCI) accepted indicator-based health service quality measurement model and the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society's (HIMSS)-Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM) are discussed. Method: This research used the bag-of-words model (BoW), a text mining method. Result: As a result of the analysis, the similarity of keywords (as unigrams) used in all of the guides was found to be approximately 33%, the bigram similarity was 6% and the trigram similarity was 3%. Conclusion:The fact that the similarity between the two models is not higher can be explained by the fact that, unlike JCI, the HIMSS EMRAM model handles the quality of health services with a digitalization axis. Text mining opens up new research areas as a method for comparing quality standards with new and interesting results.

show abstract

“…to meet the need for quality care performance ensuring compliance with the optimum requirements, which are evaluated by an objective expert survey team. 3 A theoretical approach for accreditation has been proposed by Desveaux et al, 4 who hypothesized 3 stages seeking a visible impact on health care quality: (1) alignment of accreditation with the organizational vision, mission, and values, called "coherence"; (2) "buyin" for acceptance of positive changes by champions seeking better care; (3) "action" by implementing quality improvement projects in response to accreditation findings.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Perception of Health Care Professionals Toward Hospital Accreditation at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare

Al-Sayedahmed,

Al-Qaaneh,

Al-Tawfiq

et al. 2023

Quality Management in Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives: The quality of health care relies on achieving the best quality and patient safety goals, and accreditation plays a fundamental role in achieving these goals through compliance with standards that guide excellence. Accreditation also helps streamline operations and supports evidence-based quality improvement plans. This study aims to evaluate the perception of health care professionals on the accreditation process and its impact on the quality of health care and patient safety. Methods: This is a cross-sectional questionnaire survey distributed via the SuccessFactors website and made accessible to all hospital staff. Results: The online questionnaire was completed by 2047 participants, representing 51% of the entire hospital staff at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare (JHAH). Overall analysis indicated a positive perception of accreditation benefits among health care employees (as indicated by participation in accreditation activities and/or preparation for the survey visits) and reflected on patient health care quality and safety dimensions, with an overall Likert median score of 4.0 (interquartile range = 3.7-5.0; P < .05). Conclusion: The outcomes of our study confirm that JHAH employees perceived a positive impact of accreditation on health care quality improvement and patient safety. Also, the study supports considering accreditation as a fundamental requirement to improve health care system processes. However, it is critical to sustain quality of services over time during accreditation cycles.

show abstract

Advantages and Disadvantages of Health Care Accreditation Mod-els

Cited by 22 publications

References 57 publications

Precision Anaesthesia: Advancing Patient-Centered Precision Care Through Repetitive Assessment of PROMs with the Safe Brain Initiative Approach

Precision Anaesthesia: Advancing Patient-Centered Precision Care Through Repetitive Assessment of PROMs with the Safe Brain Initiative Approach

Comparative Analysis of Joint Commission International and Healthcare Information and Management Systems - Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model Measurement Models using Text Mining

Perception of Health Care Professionals Toward Hospital Accreditation at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About