2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advantages and disadvantages of the prone position in the surgical treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 28 , 29 The choice of position is based on surgeon experience, and prone position been shown to facilitate reduction, to use the C-arm more easily, and to reduce the rate of iatrogenic nerve injury. 30 , 31 However, it could make upper airways management, as well as treatment of polytrauma patients, more difficult; in addition, when the exposure of the antecubital fossa is needed for reduction or neurovascular exploration, the patient should be repositioned. 32 However, only 11 out of 184 (6%) respondents declared to position the patient prone, while 17 (9.2%) declared to perform the operation with the patient in this position only in selected cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 , 29 The choice of position is based on surgeon experience, and prone position been shown to facilitate reduction, to use the C-arm more easily, and to reduce the rate of iatrogenic nerve injury. 30 , 31 However, it could make upper airways management, as well as treatment of polytrauma patients, more difficult; in addition, when the exposure of the antecubital fossa is needed for reduction or neurovascular exploration, the patient should be repositioned. 32 However, only 11 out of 184 (6%) respondents declared to position the patient prone, while 17 (9.2%) declared to perform the operation with the patient in this position only in selected cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the equal clinical and radiological results, different authors have listed the advantages of prone intraoperative positioning, such as a simpler reduction, a more comfortable use of C-arm and a reduction in nerve injuries. In case of posterior displacement, the gravity force correctly positions the distal humerus in the frontal plane [32]. Moreover, an easier gravity-guided reduction avoids the elbow hyperflexion, generally needed in patients treated in supine position [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our sample, minor complications were encountered, but no nerve injuries; equally, Havlas et al [11] did not document ulnar nerve iatrogenic lesions in 455 SCHFs-affected children treated in prone position. On the other hand, the supine patient position requires minimal time [11], allowing for standard anesthesia management and the possibility to use an anterior, antero-medial or antero-lateral approach, if open reduction is needed [32,34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the flexion of the elbow made the measure of the Baumann angle more difficult. In a standard close reduction procedure, it was recommended to assess the alignment on the coronal plane in Jones’ view before pinning, due to the reduction in this position was more stable [ 22 , 30 , 31 ]. But, the measure of Baumann angle was usually more convenient and accurate in a “true” AP view (with the elbow in full extension and the forearm in full supination), although the fracture in this position is more unstable and easy to displace again [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%