2011
DOI: 10.1159/000327694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advantages and Pitfalls of Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging of Carotid Bifurcation

Abstract: Objectives: Several specialists use three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound as adjuvant imaging technique in their clinical practice. It has been applied to study carotid plaque morphology, surface and volume during atherosclerosis progression. Nonetheless, no papers have so far described the use of this technique in conditions different than carotid stenosis, such as bifurcation anatomy changes of the caliber and vessel course modifications. Methods: Patients admitted to our ultrasound laboratory for vascular scree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three-dimensional imaging was successfully performed in 45 of the 50 cases and the technical success was 90%. In 5 of the cases, 3D volumes could not be evaluated properly because of a reverberation artifact in two cases (in near wall located carotid plaques, optimal images cannot be obtained because of the near wall that causes sonographic reverberation artifacts) and patient incompliance in 3 other cases (short patient neck and high carotid bifurcation), similarly as in the literature [14]. The plaques ranged from 2 to 12 mm in length (mean: 3.98 ±1.70 mm) and from 1.8 to 3.2 mm in width (mean: 2.11 ±0.37 mm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Three-dimensional imaging was successfully performed in 45 of the 50 cases and the technical success was 90%. In 5 of the cases, 3D volumes could not be evaluated properly because of a reverberation artifact in two cases (in near wall located carotid plaques, optimal images cannot be obtained because of the near wall that causes sonographic reverberation artifacts) and patient incompliance in 3 other cases (short patient neck and high carotid bifurcation), similarly as in the literature [14]. The plaques ranged from 2 to 12 mm in length (mean: 3.98 ±1.70 mm) and from 1.8 to 3.2 mm in width (mean: 2.11 ±0.37 mm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although 3DUS software algorithms are nowadays implemented in most high-end ultrasound systems they are scarcely used for 3DUS, despite some benefit for examination of carotid vessels which has been demonstrated in previous studies [12, 17]. This is probably due to different technical restrictions associated with the scanning process like the necessity to move the ultrasound transducer with constant velocity and without tilting which is often not achievable in a common ultrasound examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is unclear which ultrasound mode should be the basis for 3DUS, e.g. 3DUS based on high-resolution native B-mode ultrasound [11, 16, 18] or 3DUS based on power mode [10, 12, 14, 15, 17]. Together with recent advances in (3D) ultrasound technology, native B-mode ultrasound allows visualisation of carotid vessels with high temporal and spatial resolution [18], but hypoechogenic or heavily calcified plaques still remain important limitations and restricted 3D visualisation of ICAS in 16% of cases in our previous study [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, by using the same technique and by means of two kinds of evaluation (ie, morphological cross-sectional evaluation and Doppler parameters categorization), we could have two complementary findings at the same time. Obviously, in the case of discrepancy between duplex findings and clinical results, further complementary tool is required, for example by means of spiral computed tomography angiography (16) or threedimensional ultrasound imaging (37,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%