Advantages of asynchronous online focus groups and face-to-face focus groups as perceived by child, adolescent and adult participants: a survey study

Abstract

BackgroundOnline focus groups (OFGs) are increasingly used as a method of data collection. Although their advantages for research have repeatedly been described, participants’ opinions about OFGs have seldom been studied. We investigated OFG participants’ preference for participation in an OFG or a face-to-face focus group (FTF), as well as their perceptions of the advantages of both methods. We also investigated whether any differences exist between the perceptions of child, adolescent, and adult participants.MethodsParticipants’ opinions were studied by means of a questionnaire completed by 284 persons (aged 8–72 years) after their participation in one of 50 OFGs. The OFGs were conducted between December 2005 and December 2013 as part of 19 separate studies. Chi square tests with p <0.05 were used to test differences in perceived advantages of OFGs and FTFs between children, adolescents and adults.ResultsThe most important advantage of OFGs as perceived by OFG participants was the possibility to participate at a moment most convenient to them. Adolescents and adults (90.5% and 95.9%) more often reported this as an advantage than children did (30.8%, p < 0.02). Another important perceived advantage of OFGs was the possibility to participate from home (69.1%). The most important advantage of FTFs was respondents’ perception that it is easier to have a discussion with the whole group when there is personal contact with others (48.5%). This advantage was mentioned significantly more often by adults (78.4%) than by children and adolescents (4.8% and 17.7%, p < 0.02).ConclusionsParticipants’ perceptions of OFGs partly concur with the advantages of OFGs as a research method. Whereas respondents generally value the convenience of participating at their own time and place, the anonymity of OFGs and the increased ease to discuss personal issues were mentioned less often as advantages by the participants. An aspect that may need more attention when conducting an OFG, is the absence of a fluid discussion, which is, according to our respondents, easier to achieve in an FTF. This underlines the importance of the moderator in enabling a constructive discussion.

Attractiveness of working in home care: An online focus group study among nurses

“…OFGs were chosen rather than traditional face‐to‐face focus groups, because OFGs give the participants the ability to participate at a time most convenient to them. Additionally, OFGs enable participants to be recruited from a broad geographical area, because they can participate from home (Reid & Reid, ; Tates et al., ; Zwaanswijk & Van Dulmen, ).…”

Counsellee’s experience of cancer genetic counselling with pedigrees that automatically incorporate genealogical and cancer database information

“…Online focus group studies can be done in two different ways. We used an asynchronously method, where the participants log on in their own time to read contributions from others and then post contributions themselves (Tates et al 2009, Zwaanswijk andvan Dulmen 2014). The other way is synchronously, where participants log on at the same time and exchange written sentences on the chosen forum (Fox et al 2007).…”

Iteratively Developing an mHealth HIV Prevention Program for Sexual Minority Adolescent Men

“…One benefit of online FGs is that they can accommodate participants from a wide geographic area because participants can log on when and where it is convenient for them to participate [28]. Participants were thus recruited nationally.…”