2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06503.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy for superficial esophageal tumors

Abstract: Although increased operation time with ESD remains problematic, SET > 15 mm should be treated with ESD to reduce local recurrence. In lesions ≤ 15 mm, EOAM might be preferable, especially in high-risk patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ESD was developed for the purpose of reducing the incidence of local recurrence associated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), [18][19][20][21], but local recurrence remains problematic. Takenaka et al [22] identified tumor size [30 mm, tumor location in the upper third of the stomach, and incomplete resection as factors significantly associated with local recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESD was developed for the purpose of reducing the incidence of local recurrence associated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), [18][19][20][21], but local recurrence remains problematic. Takenaka et al [22] identified tumor size [30 mm, tumor location in the upper third of the stomach, and incomplete resection as factors significantly associated with local recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 One EMR session allows resection of limited size, and it is difficult to perform, especially at sites with cartilage protrusions. 29,30 Thus, EMR is performed piecemeal in many patients, but with piecemeal resection, histologic evaluation of the tumor margin is often difficult, whereas en bloc resection allows for careful checking of the tumor margin and accurate histologic assessment. Piecemeal resection of esophageal and gastric tumors seems to lead to a significantly higher local recurrence rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the median observation of 65 months, ESD gave fewer local recurrence compared with EMR [78]. Another report also demonstrated that larger superficial esophageal tumors (>15 mm) should be treated with ESD to reduce local recurrence [79].…”
Section: Endoscopic Resection (Er)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reports demonstrate that ESD may be associated with a higher risk of strictures and an esophageal perforation rate compared with EMR [80], however, in comparative medical center, these complication rates did not differ significantly [77][78][79]. Most complications can be readily dealt with by endoscopic dilatation or clips.…”
Section: Endoscopic Resection (Er)mentioning
confidence: 99%