1990
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(90)90289-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advantages of high speed scanning for microprobe analysis of biological samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bigazzi et al, 1993 and. Bordeaux-Gradignan (CENBG) the samples were analyzed on the 'Microbeam Line' of a 4 MV Van de Graaff accelerator (Llabador et al, 1990). In the vacuum sample chamber of this nuclear microprobe up to 15 samples could be introduced together, fixed on a rotating stage allowing us to make measurements on several points of their surface.…”
Section: Pixementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bigazzi et al, 1993 and. Bordeaux-Gradignan (CENBG) the samples were analyzed on the 'Microbeam Line' of a 4 MV Van de Graaff accelerator (Llabador et al, 1990). In the vacuum sample chamber of this nuclear microprobe up to 15 samples could be introduced together, fixed on a rotating stage allowing us to make measurements on several points of their surface.…”
Section: Pixementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This encouraging result is even more significant because gelatin standards, commonly used for testing and quantitative analysis of biological materials (Marshall, 1982), are much more sensitive to beam interactions than animal or plant tissues (Marshall, 1980). Mass losses during electron and proton bombardment at room temperature are evident and well documented, especially when high currents are applied (Cholewa et al, 1991;Llabador et al, 1990;Themner, 1991;Themner et al, 1990;Van Lierde, 1995;Zierold, 1988). It is therefore beneficial to perform analyses of fragile materials at low temperature.…”
Section: Limits Of Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A total of 25 geological samples and 541 artefacts have been analysed thus far at the C2RMF in the AGLAE facility (Accélérateur Grand Louvre d'Analyses Elémentaires; Calligaro et al, 2002), which external micro-beam set-up allows for the analysis of larger samples (Le Bourdonnec et al, 2005. At the CENBG, the AIFIRA platform (Applications Interdisciplinaires de Faisceaux d'Ions en Région Aquitaine) presents a nuclear microprobe capable to analyse very small samples, due to its 5-μm beam diameter (Llabador et al, 1990). A total of 30 obsidian geological samples and 134 artefacts were thus analysed at this facility.…”
Section: Iba-pixementioning
confidence: 99%