2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advective and transient effects in combined AFM/SECM operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[38] Diffusivity for each species is uniform in the electrolyte (D i ) and in the polymer (=α i D i ). Species transport across the polymer/electrolyte interface is rapid, so that local equilibrium prevails and at the interface a partitioning coefficient, θ i , relates the concentration inside the polymer to that in the solution.…”
Section: Table IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[38] Diffusivity for each species is uniform in the electrolyte (D i ) and in the polymer (=α i D i ). Species transport across the polymer/electrolyte interface is rapid, so that local equilibrium prevails and at the interface a partitioning coefficient, θ i , relates the concentration inside the polymer to that in the solution.…”
Section: Table IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because most available models such as those of Savéant and co-authors [14,[26][27][28][29] and others [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] are based on 1-D planar diffusion, usually with the enzyme reaction confined to a monolayer. But 3-D steady-state diffusion dominates in amperometric UME operation [38], and to date analytical models to describe these conditions are limited to extremely large [39] or infinite [40] entrapment domains, which electrodeposition is intended to avoid. Hence, a first principles theoretical model describing the electrodeposited polymer-entrapped enzyme microelectrode experiment is missing, and both interpretation of results and design of the microprobes are at present entirely empirical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the third component both forced and natural convection have to be taken into account [6]. Kottke et al [8] described that the hydrodynamic effects arising from the horizontal probe movement can be neglected for a combined AFM/SECM frame electrode geometry when the Peclet number is less than 0.1. Only a small number of SECM experiments with forced convection are described in literature: Combellas et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forced convection occurs as a result of the displacement of the microelectrode or substrate. It has been studied for the displacement of the microelectrode in a plane parallel to that of the substrate, 36,37 in a direction normal to the plane of the substrate 38 and for a vertically oscillating microelectrode. 21 Modeling efforts, which were corroborated with experiments, were performed in SECM studies in deep eutectic solvents 39 or in ionic liquids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forced convection occurs as a result of the displacement of the microelectrode or substrate. It has been studied for the displacement of the microelectrode in a plane parallel to that of the substrate, , in a direction normal to the plane of the substrate and for a vertically oscillating microelectrode . Modeling efforts, which were corroborated with experiments, were performed in SECM studies in deep eutectic solvents or in ionic liquids. , In fact, despite the well-established importance of convective effects when performing SECM approach curves in aqueous solvent, to the best of our knowledge, no general and quantitative discussion is available on the subject.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%