2015
DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adventitious feather replacement favours a more rapid regeneration of primaries over rectrices in two passerine bird species

Abstract: There is increasing evidence of adaptive preferential investment during moult in those feather tracts that are more advantageous for fitness. In this study, we assessed whether, after the manual removal of two functionally different flight feathers (one primary and one rectrix), birds from two common passerine species (Eurasian Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla and European Robin Erithacus rubecula) favoured the regeneration of primary (supposedly the most functionally important feathers) over rectrix feathers. Our … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the tail, the central pair of feathers acts as a protective covering for the remaining rectrices. The preformative moult in Loggerhead Shrikes, although not including all flight feathers, ensures those feathers that receive the most wear are renewed, thus maximizing the effectiveness of a moult with minimum investment (Jenni & Winkler 1994, de la Hera et al 2015. The descendant order is thought to provide better protection for growing primaries against upward bending by lift forces during flight compared with the ascendant sequence (Noordhuis 1989in Jenni & Winkler 1994.…”
Section: Hatch Year Preformative Moultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the tail, the central pair of feathers acts as a protective covering for the remaining rectrices. The preformative moult in Loggerhead Shrikes, although not including all flight feathers, ensures those feathers that receive the most wear are renewed, thus maximizing the effectiveness of a moult with minimum investment (Jenni & Winkler 1994, de la Hera et al 2015. The descendant order is thought to provide better protection for growing primaries against upward bending by lift forces during flight compared with the ascendant sequence (Noordhuis 1989in Jenni & Winkler 1994.…”
Section: Hatch Year Preformative Moultmentioning
confidence: 99%