Chemistry-specific informal science
education (chemistry outreach)
is widely practiced across all levels of the chemistry community.
College students associated with American Chemical Society and Alpha
Chi Sigma collegiate chapters are one population of chemistry outreach
practitioners who reach upward of 1 million people every year. Previous
studies of this population have characterized their goals/purposes
for conducting outreach, their understanding of the chemistry content
underlying common demonstrations/activities, as well as their teaching
and learning beliefs that they bring to their outreach teaching. The
study reported herein provides another characterization of this population’s
chemistry outreach practices by focusing on the training experiences
they receive prior to facilitating events. Using a combination of
inductive and deductive approaches, training experiences and perceived
gaps in training are characterized and compared to stages of the Cognitive
Apprenticeship Theory. Results indicate little involvement from chapter
advisors, widespread practice of “winging it” or using
trial and error when teaching children, and little training overall.
Comparisons to Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory show a primary emphasis
on modeling and coaching, with little metacognitive considerations.
Implications for outreach teaching and training (for both practitioners
and national chemistry organizations) are presented in light of these
findings.