2008
DOI: 10.1087/095315108x254485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adventures in open data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This description follows the traditional perspective of data collection and interpretation inside one organization (cf. Tananbaum, 2008). This configuration allows tailoring between the PAS and IS.…”
Section: Open Government Data As Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This description follows the traditional perspective of data collection and interpretation inside one organization (cf. Tananbaum, 2008). This configuration allows tailoring between the PAS and IS.…”
Section: Open Government Data As Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open data is a shift from the traditional system where those who interpret and collect data have been the same (Tananbaum, 2008). Traditionally, public organizations can collect data for internal use and publish aggregated data for citizens on websites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw data from research trials is beginning to be shared in academia and the sciences. For example, the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS) provides seismographic data from hundreds of stations to inspire new collaborative projects and research initiatives (Tananbaum, 2008), and the All Trials campaign pushes for the publication of raw data from clinical trials. Swivel, a 2006-2010 attempt to create a "YouTube for data", failed to get beyond the prototype stage, but showed the potential.…”
Section: What Is Open Data?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological advancements using Web 2.0 also made it possible to produce interoperable data (Kulk and Van Loenen 2012); which made some citizens to change their role from passive recipients to active producer and user of data simultaneously. Opposing the theory of diminishing utility, the value of data increases with its reuse (Meijer et al 2014;Tananbaum 2008); in fact, the products of data are sometimes more attractive than the original data (Serra 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%