2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adventures on the C3H5O potential energy surface: OH + propyne, OH + allene and related reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modified Arrhenius expressions for the ketene + CH 3 ⇆ acetonyl rate constants in both directions are presented in Table S2 in the Supporting Information. The values calculated here for acetonyl dissociation agree with those generated by Zador and Miller in their study of the allene/propyne + OH reactions within factors of 2–3, with the present results being higher; the agreement is better than a factor of 2 at lower pressures and higher temperatures. We do not compare the a‐/p‐C 3 H 4 + OH → CH 2 CO + CH 3 rate constants in our study with the results by Zador and Miller because we did not consider all possible channels for these reactions, but only those relevant to the reverse CH 2 CO + CH 3 → a‐/p‐C 3 H 4 + OH reaction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modified Arrhenius expressions for the ketene + CH 3 ⇆ acetonyl rate constants in both directions are presented in Table S2 in the Supporting Information. The values calculated here for acetonyl dissociation agree with those generated by Zador and Miller in their study of the allene/propyne + OH reactions within factors of 2–3, with the present results being higher; the agreement is better than a factor of 2 at lower pressures and higher temperatures. We do not compare the a‐/p‐C 3 H 4 + OH → CH 2 CO + CH 3 rate constants in our study with the results by Zador and Miller because we did not consider all possible channels for these reactions, but only those relevant to the reverse CH 2 CO + CH 3 → a‐/p‐C 3 H 4 + OH reaction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This radical intermediate, if stabilized, can participate in bimolecular reactions with other molecules or radicals available or undergo unimolecular dissociation, also preferably back to ketene + CH 3 . The reverse reactions for channel 1, propyne/allene + OH were recently studied by Zador and Miller using a similar UCCSD(T)‐F12/cc‐pVQZ‐f12//M06‐2X/6‐311++G(d,p) level of theory for PES and RRKM–ME for kinetics calculations. The calculated relative energies of the species and transition states common for the two studies agree within few tenths of a kcal/mol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C 2 H 3 + HO 2 reaction forms CH 2 CHO + OH as well as C 2 H 4 + O 2 , and both the rate constant and the branching fraction are uncertain; we use a rate constant for C 2 H 4 + O 2 obtained from theory by Hua et al . The rate constant for C 2 H 3 + CH 2 O → C 2 H 4 + HCO was drawn from the recent theoretical work of Zador and Miller who studied reactions on the C 3 H 5 O potential energy surface. Ethane is only formed in small quantities, mainly through the sequence C 2 H 2 +normalO CH 2 +normalH CH 3 + CH 3 C 2 H 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conformational searches were executed to determine the lowest energy structures and axial and equatorial conformers were accounted for individually (Supplemental Material S5). In addition, relevant parts of the α-tetrahydropyranyl potential energy surface were explored using KinBot [19,20] to determine its unimolecular decomposition pathways. Master Equation calculations were then conducted at the CCSD(T)-F12a/cc-PVDZ//M06-2X/6-311 ++ G * * level of theory at the conditions of the experiments in order to calculate the unimolecular decomposition rate coefficients for α-tetrahydropyranyl using the MESS code [21] .…”
Section: Ab Initio Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barrier heights for unimolecular reactions on the α-tetrahydropyranyl potential energy surface (PES) were explored using KinBot [19,20] , which found channels leading to linear radicals, ˙ C H 2 ( C H 2 ) 3 CHO (23.2 kcal/mol) or ˙ C H 2 ( C H 2 ) 2 OCH = C H 2 (34.3 kcal/mol), intramolecular hydrogen-transfer products, β-tetrahydropyranyl (34.6 kcal/mol) or γ -tetrahydropyranyl (47.3 kcal/mol), and 3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran + H (35.1 kcal/mol) from loss of hydrogen via C-H bond-scission (S10). The preceding energies listed in parentheses are relative to α-tetrahydropyranyl at the CCSD(T)-F12a/cc-PVDZ//M06-2X/6-311 ++ G * * level of theory.…”
Section: Unimolecular Decomposition Of α-Tetrahydropyranylmentioning
confidence: 99%