2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2103.07295
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adversarial Graph Disentanglement

Abstract: A real-world graph has a complex topology structure, which is often formed by the interaction of different latent factors. Disentanglement of these latent factors can effectively improve the robustness and interpretability of node representation of graph. However, most existing methods lack consideration of the intrinsic differences in links caused by factor entanglement. In this paper, we propose an Adversarial Disentangled Graph Convolutional Network (ADGCN) for disentangled graph representation learning. Sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current multi-intent modeling usually adopts a disentangled representation learning paradigm, which splits the user embedding into multiple chunks and tries to learn each chunked emebedding respectively for representing each user intent. In graph representation learning area, DisenGCN [13], IPGDN [11] and ADGCN [36] adopt such a paradigm and utilize the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) and adversarial learning for ensuring the effectiveness of intent modeling. As for recommendation scenarios, DGCF [24] proposes to disentagnle the user representations and adopts a mutual information restraint for the independence of all intents.…”
Section: Multi-intent Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current multi-intent modeling usually adopts a disentangled representation learning paradigm, which splits the user embedding into multiple chunks and tries to learn each chunked emebedding respectively for representing each user intent. In graph representation learning area, DisenGCN [13], IPGDN [11] and ADGCN [36] adopt such a paradigm and utilize the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) and adversarial learning for ensuring the effectiveness of intent modeling. As for recommendation scenarios, DGCF [24] proposes to disentagnle the user representations and adopts a mutual information restraint for the independence of all intents.…”
Section: Multi-intent Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.3.2 Disentanglement. SAD already captures informative component representation corresponding to different factors, named micro-disentanglement [52]. To fully disentangle the sensitive attribute into an independent component, macro-disentanglement [52], emphasizing independence between different components, need to be considered in SAD.…”
Section: Optimization Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAD already captures informative component representation corresponding to different factors, named micro-disentanglement [52]. To fully disentangle the sensitive attribute into an independent component, macro-disentanglement [52], emphasizing independence between different components, need to be considered in SAD. Thus, we employ distance correlation as a regularizer and a channel discriminator đť‘“ đť‘‘ as a supervisor to guide the training of FairSAD.…”
Section: Optimization Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%