2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adversarial life testing: A Bayesian negotiation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of adversarial situations in reliability analysis can be found in areas such as acceptance sampling ( Lindley & Singpurwalla, 1991 ); life testing ( Lindley & Singpurwalla, 1993 ); warranty analysis ( Singpurwalla & Wilson, 1993 ); and optimal release policies in software testing ( Zeephongsekul & Chiera, 1995 ). More recent work in this area considers adversarial issues in optimal maintenance as in Jackson and Pascual (2008) ; service and warranty contracts ( Esmaeilia, Gamchia, & Asgharizadeh, 2014 ); system reliability ( Hausken, 2008 ); and reliability demonstration ( Rufo, Martin, & Perez, 2014 ). These problems with adversarial elements can be set up as games and are typically solved using (non cooperative) game theory methods based on Nash equilibria and related concepts, see, for example, Gibbons (1992) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of adversarial situations in reliability analysis can be found in areas such as acceptance sampling ( Lindley & Singpurwalla, 1991 ); life testing ( Lindley & Singpurwalla, 1993 ); warranty analysis ( Singpurwalla & Wilson, 1993 ); and optimal release policies in software testing ( Zeephongsekul & Chiera, 1995 ). More recent work in this area considers adversarial issues in optimal maintenance as in Jackson and Pascual (2008) ; service and warranty contracts ( Esmaeilia, Gamchia, & Asgharizadeh, 2014 ); system reliability ( Hausken, 2008 ); and reliability demonstration ( Rufo, Martin, & Perez, 2014 ). These problems with adversarial elements can be set up as games and are typically solved using (non cooperative) game theory methods based on Nash equilibria and related concepts, see, for example, Gibbons (1992) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major decisions require a detailed analysis of future negotiations interactions, which would allow to meet the priorities and interests of another party to negotiations. Game theory can help to achieve these objectives, since it is a mathematical discipline that deals with the interactions of parties having their targets (Rufo et al, 2014). It is a powerful tool for understanding the relationships that develop in the processes of cooperation and competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a powerful tool for understanding the relationships that develop in the processes of cooperation and competition. The main objective during the negotiations in decision-making processes is to choose alternatives that would be acceptable to both parties, and it should be carried out within a reasonable period of time (Oderanti et al, 2012;Chuah et al, 2014;Kozina, 2014;Lin et al, 2014;Suh & Park, 2010;Rufo et al, 2014). The friction of different interests, such as competition, or other challenging situations often arise from illegal practices which are expected from human relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations