Adversarial Linkages: The Urban Poor and Electoral Politics in Jakarta

Abstract

This article examines how social movements based in poor communities make electoral alliances with politicians in contemporary Indonesia. Drawing on case studies of the urban poor in two elections in Jakarta, we point to a pattern of adversarial linkages by which movements present candidates with demands – in this case about housing and livelihood security – which are then distilled in formal ‘political contracts’. Unlike institutionalised relationships between parties and social constituencies in many democracies, these linkages are ad hoc, pragmatic and characterised by mistrust. In Jakarta, they involved disaggregation rather than aggregation of interests, with movement actors in the second election in 2017 seeking concrete gains relating to land and livelihoods in particular neighbourhoods, rather than a broad programme of urban reform, as had been their goal in 2012. We suggest that such adversarial linkages are a feature of contemporary Indonesian politics. They allow marginal groups to make contingent political gains but are compatible with prevailing clientelistic patterns, which limit their potential to promote systemic change.

The Life Potrait of Urban Society within O, the Novel by Eka Kurniawan

“…The story is in line with Savirani, et al research that "As with Indonesia as a whole, poverty is a major problem in the capital city [7]. Official statistics from March 2016 show that 384,000 people -3.75 per cent of the total population of Jakarta -were living in poverty".…”

World Class Aspirations, Urban Informality, and Poverty Politics: A North–South Comparison

“…At the height of the authoritarian Suharto era, and modified in 2007, the city passed public order laws (Perda 11/1988, Perda 8/2007) prohibiting settlement within 10 metres of rivers and other water bodies, in parks and green spaces, along railroad tracks, and under flyovers and bridges. Kampungs that in some cases long preceded these orders were declared illegal overnight, but continue to contest this designation with the help of pro‐poor activist groups—with some recent success (Savirani and Aspinall ). In peri‐urban greater Jakarta, beyond the legal reach of the DKI government, there has been massive expansion of kampung settlement over the past ten years housing migrants unable to find space in DKI Jakarta.…”

“…A leitmotif throughout this paper has been how, in both Jakarta and San Francisco, the practice of neoliberal global urbanism, inter alia, has sought to formalise the informal so as to enable “proper” and profitable (capitalist) markets. Yet this project remains both incomplete and contested (Leitner and Sheppard ; Maskovksy and Piven 2020; Padawangi ; Savirani and Aspinall ; Simone ; Tilley et al ). The congenital failure of capitalism to end poverty as we know it means that urban informality remains a necessary alternative, demonstrating that capitalism also can be destabilised from the grassroots (Baldwin and Crane ; Gibson‐Graham ; Sheppard ).…”

Insurgent planner: Transgressing the technocratic state of postcolonial Jakarta

“…Most of the evicted communities voted to send Jokowi to the Jakarta governor's seat in 2012 and afterwards to the presidential palace in 2014. His election polls were no accident, as several civil society and grassroots organisations mobilised support for Jokowi's political platform (Lay, 2017;Savirani and Aspinall, 2017). Ciliwung Merdeka and Urban Poor Consortium -with its grassroots organisations Jaringan Rakyat Miskin Kota (Urban Poor Networks -JRMK) -were part of this popular movement.…”