2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2968935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adversarial Mobility Learning for Human Trajectory Classification

Abstract: Understanding human mobility is one of the important but challenging tasks in Location-based Social Networks (LBSN). Recently, a user mobility mining task called Trajectory User Linking (TUL) has become an essential and popular topic, aiming at identifying user identities through exploiting their mobility patterns. Existing methods mainly focus on learning sequential mobility patterns by capturing long-short term dependencies among historical check-ins. However, users have personalized moving preferences, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. [24] proposed the AdattTUL model to dynamically capture the complex relationship of user check-in from trajectory data. Ref.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [24] proposed the AdattTUL model to dynamically capture the complex relationship of user check-in from trajectory data. Ref.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Gao et al [40] studied the trajectory user linking problem to identify user identities from mobility pa erns. ey combined autoencoder with GANs for jointly human mobility learning, which provides regularized latent space for mobility classi cation.…”
Section: Gans For Trajectory Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discriminator tries to maximize the probability of correctly distinguishing the true check-in locations from the generated recommended POIs by the recommender. Gao et al [101] also uses GAN networks for identifying individuals by exploiting their trajectories.…”
Section: Ganmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basic RNN -2016 ST-RNN [37] 2018 MCI-DNN [73] 2020 Flashback [38], ASPPA [39], LLRec [40], DRLM [72] LSTM Basic LSTM 2018 HST-LSTM [74], TMCA [42], SLSTM [83] 2019 LSPL [75], ASTEN [77], ATST-LSTM [80], MMR [81], SGBA [82] 2020 PLSPL [76], LSTPM [41], iMTL [43], CatDM [44], ARNN [78], STAR [79] Bi-LSTM 2020 GT-HAN [84], t-LocPred [86], CAPRE [87] Modified LSTM 2020 STGN [88] Self-Attention 2020 GeoSAN [48], SANST [49] GRU -2018 DeepMove [45], CARA [46] 2019 MGRU [47] Graph Embedding -2016 GE [90] 2017 STA [50] 2018 JLGE [92] 2019 RELINE [51] 2020 DYSTAL [52], HCT [96], UP2VEC [98], HMRM [97] GAN -2019 Geo-ALM [99], APOIR [100] 2020 AdattTUL [101] Others -2017 Geo-Teaser [23], LCE [114] 2018 CAPE [102], ST-DME [115] 2019 Bi-STDDP [103], TEMN…”
Section: Category Subcategory Year Referencementioning
confidence: 99%