2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adversarially Learned One-Class Classifier for Novelty Detection

Abstract: Novelty detection is the process of identifying the observation(s) that differ in some respect from the training observations (the target class). In reality, the novelty class is often absent during training, poorly sampled or not well defined. Therefore, one-class classifiers can efficiently model such problems. However, due to the unavailability of data from the novelty class, training an end-to-end deep network is a cumbersome task. In this paper, inspired by the success of generative adversarial networks f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
503
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 662 publications
(505 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
503
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluate our method on the UCSD Ped2 dataset [8], which is a popular dataset for this task. We follow the evaluation criteria of [51]. Similar to [51], the frame-level accuracy is reported as the performance metric.…”
Section: Video Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We evaluate our method on the UCSD Ped2 dataset [8], which is a popular dataset for this task. We follow the evaluation criteria of [51]. Similar to [51], the frame-level accuracy is reported as the performance metric.…”
Section: Video Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow the evaluation criteria of [51]. Similar to [51], the frame-level accuracy is reported as the performance metric. In frame-level measure, a frame is considered as anomaly, if at least one of its pixels is detected as anomaly.…”
Section: Video Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bad estimation significantly affected the error map though the three cars running on other way were correctly determined. The results may thus be im- Method Belleview Train GANomaly [2] 0.735 0.194 AEs + local feature [35] 0.748 0.171 AEs + global feature [35] 0.776 0.216 ALOCC D(X) [40] 0.734 0.182 ALOCC D(R(X)) [40] 0.805 0.237 Our proposed method 0.751 0.490 SSIM on appearance stream 0.830 0.798 Table 3. The average precision of frame-level anomaly detection on the Traffic-Belleview and Traffic-Train datasets.…”
Section: Traffic-belleview and Traffic-trainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep approaches to anomaly detection for image data often use a convolutional autoencoder (CAE) which include convolutional layers in the AE architecture [24,31]. Another line of work uses Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) for this task [8,27,29]. This two-step process is also used to make the density estimation task easier by learning low-dimensional representations.…”
Section: Deep Learning For Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%