1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80300-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse drug reaction processing in the United States and its dependence on physician reporting: Zomepirac (Zomax®) as a case in point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A small but significant number of fatalities occur due to a drug administration error, that is, the patient was already known to be allergic to the relevant drug, or a closely related drug. 45 This was most clearly reported in Australia, where 9 of 27 cases of fatal penicillin or cephalosporin anaphylaxis were known to be penicillin-allergic. 11 …”
Section: Fatal Drug Anaphylaxismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A small but significant number of fatalities occur due to a drug administration error, that is, the patient was already known to be allergic to the relevant drug, or a closely related drug. 45 This was most clearly reported in Australia, where 9 of 27 cases of fatal penicillin or cephalosporin anaphylaxis were known to be penicillin-allergic. 11 …”
Section: Fatal Drug Anaphylaxismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…14,20 Thus, the main objective of this study was to examine the TNP-OVA PLNA as a pre-clinical predictive assay for use in identifying the immunostimulating potential of LMWCs associated with anaphylaxis in humans and to determine if the immunostimulation results in IgE antibody production. This study used the NSAID zomepirac and the analgesic glafenine, because both were pulled from the market due to a high association with anaphylaxis, 17,18 and it used the NSAID diclofenac, which is frequently associated with anaphylaxis but remains on the market. 19 In the TNP-OVA PLNA, all three drugs increased PLN diameter, weight and cellularity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SRS was meant to serve as a type of early warning system for adverse drug reactions that were not noticed in clinical trials. 17,18 Because it is mandatory for manufacturers to report any serious adverse drug reactions that are reported to them, approximately 80% of the reports submitted to the SRS are from manufacturers' reports. The other 20% come directly from healthcare professionals and individual consumers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other 20% come directly from healthcare professionals and individual consumers. 17 Although the SRS was developed in the early 1960s, computerized reports are only available starting January 1969. 17,18 In an effort to standardize and globalize the US reporting database, the FDA implemented a new reporting system, the AERS, in November 1997.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation