2020
DOI: 10.1177/0333102420950484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse effects of erenumab on cerebral proliferative angiopathy: A case report

Abstract: Background Cerebral proliferative angiopathy is a vascular malformation associated with compromised blood-brain barrier and with migraine-like headache. Treating blood-brain barrier-compromised patients with erenumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor monoclonal antibody, may be risky. Case We describe a case of a 22-year-old chronic migraine patient with cerebral proliferative angiopathy who presented to our hospital in status epilepticus 2 d after his first dose of erenumab. Serial magnetic re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single intravenous administration of erenumab 140 mg in patients with stable angina did not aggravate exercice-induced angina or ST-segment depression [ 149 ], but this study was criticized because it explored a single acute administration too short before the treadmill test to allow for complete tissue distribution and comprised few women with angina in whom the distal coronary artery system, the most sensitive to CGRP, is chiefly involved. With a follow-up now exceeding 6 years, serious treatment-related vascular adverse events have not been reported with anti-CGRP/rec mAbs [ 150 , 151 ], with the exception of 2 case reports complicated by comorbid features: an ischemic stroke in a patient with cerebral proliferative angiopathy [ 152 ], and reversible cerebral vasospasm in a patient treated with erenumab, a triptan and a combined contraceptive pill [ 153 ]. Despite the absence up to now of a signal of worse outcomes for cerebral or coronary ischemia under anti-CGRP/rec mAbs, their use is contraindicated in patients with recent stroke, unstable angina or myocardial infarction.…”
Section: What Are the Potential Contraindications Of Anti-cgrp/rec Mabs?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single intravenous administration of erenumab 140 mg in patients with stable angina did not aggravate exercice-induced angina or ST-segment depression [ 149 ], but this study was criticized because it explored a single acute administration too short before the treadmill test to allow for complete tissue distribution and comprised few women with angina in whom the distal coronary artery system, the most sensitive to CGRP, is chiefly involved. With a follow-up now exceeding 6 years, serious treatment-related vascular adverse events have not been reported with anti-CGRP/rec mAbs [ 150 , 151 ], with the exception of 2 case reports complicated by comorbid features: an ischemic stroke in a patient with cerebral proliferative angiopathy [ 152 ], and reversible cerebral vasospasm in a patient treated with erenumab, a triptan and a combined contraceptive pill [ 153 ]. Despite the absence up to now of a signal of worse outcomes for cerebral or coronary ischemia under anti-CGRP/rec mAbs, their use is contraindicated in patients with recent stroke, unstable angina or myocardial infarction.…”
Section: What Are the Potential Contraindications Of Anti-cgrp/rec Mabs?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Considering the evolution of her migraine history, we selected the newer anti-CGRP antibody treatment given the patient's limited treatment options and the potential for significant improvement in her disability, mood, and quality of life; however, we hypothesized that PEX might remove fremanezumab from the circulation, thus reducing its biological effects and clinical benefits. This hypothesis was further suggested by a recent case report by Lehman et al 12 where PEX-mediated therapeutic removal of the anti-CGRP antibody erenumab from blood was described. In fact, it was considered the potential causative agent for status epilepticus in a patient with cerebral proliferative angiopathy treated with the drug.…”
Section: Con Clus Ionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Previous studies noted various EEG abnormalities of CPA, such as intermittent slow wave activity, diffuse slowing, or even periodic lateralizing epileptiform discharges. 5,10,11 The incidence of hemorrhage in CPA was estimated at 18%, which was significantly lower compared to cerebral AVM (50%). 2 This was consistent with our finding in which despite a large lesion size, the CPA did not lead to hemorrhage nor cause a focal neurological deficit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%