Adverse events among Ontario home care clients associated with emergency room visit or hospitalization: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

BackgroundHome care (HC) is a critical component of the ongoing restructuring of healthcare in Canada. It impacts three dimensions of healthcare delivery: primary healthcare, chronic disease management, and aging at home strategies. The purpose of our study is to investigate a significant safety dimension of HC, the occurrence of adverse events and their related outcomes. The study reports on the incidence of HC adverse events, the magnitude of the events, the types of events that occur, and the consequences experienced by HC clients in the province of Ontario.MethodsA retrospective cohort design was used, utilizing comprehensive secondary databases available for Ontario HC clients from the years 2008 and 2009. The data were derived from the Canadian Home Care Reporting System, the Hospital Discharge Abstract Database, the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System, the Ontario Mental Health Reporting System, and the Continuing Care Reporting System. Descriptive analysis was used to identify the type and frequency of the adverse events recorded and the consequences of the events. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between the events and their consequences.ResultsThe study found that the incident rate for adverse events for the HC clients included in the cohort was 13%. The most frequent adverse events identified in the databases were injurious falls, injuries from other than a fall, and medication-related incidents. With respect to outcomes, we determined that an injurious fall was associated with a significant increase in the odds of a client requiring long-term-care facility admission and of client death. We further determined that three types of events, delirium, sepsis, and medication-related incidents were associated directly with an increase in the odds of client death.ConclusionsOur study concludes that 13% of clients in homecare experience an adverse event annually. We also determined that an injurious fall was the most frequent of the adverse events and was associated with increased admission to long-term care or death. We recommend the use of tools that are presently available in Canada, such as the Resident Assessment Instrument and its Clinical Assessment Protocols, for assessing and mitigating the risk of an adverse event occurring.

The association between home care visits and same-day emergency department use: a case–crossover study

“…30 Currently, care and monitoring outside of the home care visits is predominantly assumed by the patient and family, who would require self-care knowledge and skills to prevent unplanned hospital admissions. 21 The involvement of more nurse practitioners in home care or on-call primary care could address some of the acute needs that would otherwise result in an emergency department visit. Additionally, the current model of care for patients not receiving palliative care (nearly all) does not operate with full integration of primary care.…”

The Relationship Among Evidence‐Based Practice and Client Dyspnea, Pain, Falls, and Pressure Ulcer Outcomes in the Community Setting

“…Patient characteristic variables, such as health status and morbidity, also can affect nursing care (Doran et al, 2006) and outcomes (Irvine et al, 2000;Doran et al 2006;Tourangeau et al, 2007). The patient characteristic variables of interest in this study were client age, gender, medical diagnoses, and length on service and were primarily included as control variables because they reflect clients' potential for improved outcomes (Doran et al, 2006;Stevens, Ryan, & Kresnow, 2006;Doran et al, 2013). Nurses' role (i.e., nursing process) has three subcomponents: nurses' independent role, nurses' dependent role, and nurses' interdependent role.…”

Alternative perspectives of safety in home delivered health care: a sequential exploratory mixed method study

“…Where evidence does exist on safety in the home setting, it is primarily derived from the study of adverse events in the Canadian home healthcare system, which indicates an adverse event rate of 13% (Doran et al . ). However, Masotti et al .…”